City and County of San Francisco - Meeting of Government Audit and Oversight Committee on 1/19/2023 at 10:00 AM

221209

Thu, 23 Jan 2025 01:08:47 GMT

File #: 221209
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Resolution
Title: Resolution urging the City Administrator’s Office to conduct a Local Business Enterprises (LBE) disparity study to analyze disparities in the City and County of San Francisco’s contracting to women-owned, minority-owned, and disabled Veteran-owned businesses.
Action: RECOMMENDED
Result: Pass

221181

Thu, 12 Oct 2023 22:04:17 GMT

File #: 221181
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Resolution
Title: Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 on behalf of a class of 2320 Registered Nurses and 2328 Nurse Practitioners against the City and County of San Francisco by the payment of $236,895.29; the claim was filed on January 30, 2020; the claim involves a labor dispute.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221188

Thu, 12 Oct 2023 22:04:17 GMT

File #: 221188
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Margarita Herrera against the City and County of San Francisco for $650,000; the lawsuit was filed on July 30, 2019, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-19-578026; entitled Margarita Herrera v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221189

Thu, 12 Oct 2023 22:04:17 GMT

File #: 221189
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Dante King against the City and County of San Francisco for $562,500; the lawsuit was filed on September 21, 2022, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-22-601923; entitled Dante King v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221190

Thu, 23 Jan 2025 01:03:39 GMT

File #: 221190
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Michael Oakes against the City and County of San Francisco for $95,000; the lawsuit was filed on July 10, 2020, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-20-585373; entitled Michael Oakes v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221191

Thu, 12 Oct 2023 22:04:17 GMT

File #: 221191
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Jo-Theresa Elias-Jackson against the City and County of San Francisco for $92,000; the lawsuit was filed on April 23, 2021, in United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 3:21-cv-02937-PJH; entitled Jo-Theresa Elias-Jackson v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221192

Thu, 12 Oct 2023 22:04:17 GMT

File #: 221192
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Resolution
Title: Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Cassandra McQuaid against the City and County of San Francisco for $75,000; the claim was filed on September 10, 2021; the claim involves an employment dispute.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221193

Thu, 12 Oct 2023 22:04:17 GMT

File #: 221193
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Resolution
Title: Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Osterweis Capital Management, LLC against the City and County of San Francisco for $106,978.79; the claim was filed on September 26, 2022; the claim involves a refund of gross receipts tax.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221229

Thu, 07 Dec 2023 19:31:15 GMT

File #: 221229
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility against the City and County of San Francisco for $0; the lawsuit was filed on April 21, 2021, in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 4:21-cv-02871-JST; entitled New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility v. City and County of San Francisco, California; the lawsuit involves the denial of a Conditional Use Authorization to install a wireless telecommunications facility at 590-2nd Avenue; other material terms of the settlement are approval of the Planning Commission’s Conditional Use Authorization based on a modification of the proposed facility’s design which moves a screened equipment enclosure away from the building edge, rescission of Board of Supervisors Motions Nos. M21-052, M21-053, and M21-75 that disapproved that Conditional Use Authorization, directed the preparation of findings, and made findings pertaining to the same, dismissal of the lawsuit in its entirety with prejudice; and making environmental findings
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221230

Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:38:24 GMT

File #: 221230
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Resolution
Title: Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claims filed by A2Z Development USA, Inc. against the City and County of San Francisco for $1,399,196; the claims were filed on February 28, 2022; the claims involve a refund of payroll expense and gross receipts taxes.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221231

Fri, 01 Aug 2025 21:40:05 GMT

File #: 221231
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Resolution
Title: Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation against the City and County of San Francisco for $76,250; the claim was filed on July 11, 2022; the claim involves an alleged overpayment of Homelessness Gross Receipts Tax penalties and interest for the 2019 tax year.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

221232

Thu, 12 Oct 2023 22:04:17 GMT

File #: 221232
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Resolution
Title: Resolution approving a Tolling Agreement to extend the statute of limitations for A-N SFD Owner, LLC for the former Sir Francis Drake Hotel to bring potential litigation against the City and County of San Francisco for a refund of real property transfer tax to allow for possible resolution of the matter without litigation.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass