City and County of San Francisco - Meeting of Audit, Labor and Government Efficiency Committee on 7/24/2001 at 2:00 PM

011341

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:14 GMT

File #: 011341
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Hearing
Title: Hearing to discuss the status of the City's pay toilets including, but not limited to, the following concerns: reports of vandalism, reports of breakdowns, monthly reports by the Department of Public Works, maintenance schedules, and arrests made for illegal activities.
Action: CONTINUED TO CALL OF THE CHAIR
Result: Pass

010845

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:11 GMT

File #: 010845
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance amending San Francisco Police Code Section 1023 to exempt dances and dancehalls from the need to obtain a dancehall permit if the location where the dance is being held has a place of entertainment permit and provides free drinking water.
Action:
Result:

010941

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:10 GMT

File #: 010941
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance extending to employees of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, certain benefits which ordinarily accrue from participation in the City's Deferred Compensation Plan.
Action: RECOMMENDED
Result: Pass

010942

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:10 GMT

File #: 010942
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance extending to employees of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, certain benefits which ordinarily accrue from participation in the Retirement System.
Action: RECOMMENDED
Result: Pass

011093

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:10 GMT

File #: 011093
Ver.: 2
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance amending the Administrative Code by adding Section 16.61-5 authorizing the Retirement System to accept rollovers from other tax qualified plans for buy-backs.
Action: RECOMMENDED
Result: Pass

011302

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:10 GMT

File #: 011302
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Romulo Fontanilla against the City and County of San Francisco for $95,000.00 as back pay, with the Court to decide the amount of attorney's fees and costs with a floor of $70,000.00 and a ceiling of $120,000.00; the lawsuit was filed on October 28, 1996 in the U.S. District Court, Case No. C96-3916 JCS; entitled Romulo Fontanilla, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

011221

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:10 GMT

File #: 011221
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Resolution
Title: Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Christine Dean against San Francisco for $32,000; claim was filed on October 30, 2000; additional material term of said settlement is the signing of liability against the City and County of San Francisco.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

011193

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:10 GMT

File #: 011193
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Resolution
Title: Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Knickerbocker Properties XXXIII against San Francisco for $44,284.24; claim was filed on 04-06-2001; additional material terms of said settlement is the signing of full and final release of the City and County of San Francisco.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

011132

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:10 GMT

File #: 011132
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by CARMEN LeFRANC against the City and County of San Francisco for $51,000.00; the lawsuit was filed on August 5, 1999 in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. 305440; entitled Carmen LeFranc, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass

011131

Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:33:10 GMT

File #: 011131
Ver.: 1
Agenda #:
Type: Ordinance
Title: Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Plaintiffs Vicki Rooker, et al. against the City and County of San Francisco for $114,054.77; the lawsuit was filed on March 9, 1999 in United States District Court, Case No. C99-1095; entitled Rooker, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco, et al; other material terms of said settlement are: (1) settlement pertains only to plaintiffs' claims that the city improperly computed plaintiffs' wages during the time period plaintiffs worked as classification 2532 paramedics; and (2) settlement proceeds to be broken out as follows: (i) $62,703.18 in back overtime wages; (ii) $31,351.59 in liquidated damages; and (iii) $20,000 in attorneys' fees.
Action: RECOMMENDED..
Result: Pass