|
Title:
|
Motion that the Board of Supervisors convene in closed session with the City Attorney for the purpose of conferring with, or receiving advice from, the City Attorney regarding the following existing litigation in which the plaintiffs and claimants, various businesses, are, in sum, challenging the constitutionality of the City's business taxing system. These plaintiffs and claimants are also seeking reimbursement of tax payments made to the City:
Eastman Kodak Company v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 302-983
Date filed: 4/22/99
General Motors Corporation v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 301-510
EOP-580 California Street, L.L.C., et al. v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 315-704
General Motors Corporation, et al. v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 312-487
Hewlett-Packard, et al. v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 306-787
The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 310-061
Panther Creek Leasing, Inc. et al. v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 307-873
Providian Financial Corporation, et al. v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 316-461
Signature Network, Inc., et al. v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 312-489
Union Pacific Railroad Co., et al. v. San Francisco
San Francisco Superior Court No. 309-421
Various other related cases and claims against San Francisco filed by other businesses.
This closed session would be permitted by Government Code Section 54956.9(c), and San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.10(d).
|