011406
| 1 | | Board of Appeals Videotape of Meetings | Ordinance | Filed | Ordinance amending the San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code by adding a new section 11.1 to require that the Board of Appeals videotape meetings and make the meetings available for broadcast on the City's government access channel. | CONTINUED TO CALL OF THE CHAIR | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
011216
| 1 | | Long-term Power Contract with Calpine Energy | Hearing | Filed | Hearing to examine the long-term contract entered into by the City and County of San Francisco and Calpine Energy on May 7, 2001. | CONTINUED TO CALL OF THE CHAIR | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
011629
| 1 | | Exotic Dance Establishments | Hearing | Filed | Hearing to address the safety conditions within San Francisco's exotic dance establishments, the working conditions for dancers and other club employees, and to explore how public agencies can ensure a safe and healthy working environment within these establishments. | CONTINUED TO CALL OF THE CHAIR | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
011843
| 1 | | MOU - Fighters, Local 798, Unit 1 | Ordinance | Passed | Ordinance adopting and implementing the provisions of a Memorandum of Understanding between the San Francisco Fire Fighters Union Local 798, IAFF, AFL-CIO Unit 1 and the City and County of San Francisco to be effective for the period July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2003. | RECOMMENDED | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
011868
| 1 | | MOU - Fire Fighters, Local 798, Unit 2 | Ordinance | Passed | Ordinance adopting and implementing the provisions of a Memorandum of Understanding between the San Francisco Fire Fighters Union Local 798, IAFF, AFL-CIO Unit 2 and the City and County of San Francisco to be effective for the period July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2003. | RECOMMENDED | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
011876
| 1 | | Settlement of Lawsuit | Ordinance | Passed | Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by A. Ruiz Construction Company against the City and County of San Francisco for $200,000.00; the lawsuit was filed on July 10, 2000, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. 312-041; entitled A. Ruiz Construction Company v. City and County of San Francisco. | RECOMMENDED.. | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
011877
| 1 | | Settlement of Lawsuit | Ordinance | Passed | Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by 111 Chestnut Street Condominium Homeowners Association, 220 Lombard Street Condominium Homeowners Association, 240 Lombard Street Condominium Homeowners Association, Lombard Plaza Owners Association, associations representing property owners of the Parc Telegraph development, against the City and County of San Francisco for $41,500, monitoring services of Frank Rollo, Sr., and debris removal; the lawsuit was filed on November 13, 1997 in the Superior Court of San Francisco, Case No. 991-050; entitled 111 Chestnut Condominium Homeowners Association, et al v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. | RECOMMENDED.. | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
011902
| 1 | | Settlement of Claim | Resolution | Passed | Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Luis Lazaro against San Francisco for $30,000; claim was filed on 06-16-2000; additional material terms of said settlement are the signing of full and final release, minor compromise and dismissal of the City and County of San Francisco. | RECOMMENDED.. | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
011904
| 1 | | Settlement of Lawsuit | Ordinance | Passed | Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by the City and County of San Francisco and the Environmental Law Foundation against the United States Tobacco Company, other manufacturers of smokeless tobacco products, and major retail chains that sell smokeless tobacco in California, for $2,750,000; the lawsuit was filed on March 31, 1998 in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. 993-992; entitled City and County of San Francisco and Environmental Law Foundation v. United States Tobacco Co., et al.; other material terms of said settlement are that the smokeless tobacco manufacturers shall distribute warning signs required by Proposition 65 to their retailers throughout the state, and that the retailer defendants shall post those signs. | RECOMMENDED.. | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|