|
220401
| 2 | | Street Name Change - From “Hahn Street” to “Mrs. Jackson Way” | Resolution | Passed | Resolution renaming Hahn Street, between Visitacion Avenue and Sunnydale Avenue, to “Mrs. Jackson Way;” with additional post passage directives to Public Works, the Municipal Transportation Agency, and the County Surveyor. | RECOMMENDED AS COMMITTEE REPORT | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
|
220448
| 1 | | Resolution of Intention to Vacate Streets - Portions of Griffith Street and Hudson Avenue as Part of 900 Innes Avenue Park Development and Public Utility Easements at 700 Innes Avenue | Resolution | Passed | Resolution declaring the intention of the Board to order the vacation of 1) a portion of Griffith Street and a portion of Hudson Avenue, generally bounded by Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4629A, Lot No. 010, a portion of Hudson Avenue at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4646, Lot Nos. 001, 002, and 003, a portion of Innes Avenue and a portion of Griffith Street at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4645, Lot No. 010, a portion of Hudson Avenue at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4630, Lot No. 002, and a portion of Galvez Avenue (“the Street Vacation Area”), to facilitate the development of the 900 Innes Avenue (India Basin) Park Development; 2) an unaccepted ten-foot public utility easements affecting portions of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4607, Lot Nos. 024 and 025; Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4620, Lot Nos. 001 and 002 (with Lot No. 002 more recently referred to by the City as Lot Nos. 004 and 005); Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4621, Lot No. 100; Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4606, Lot No. 026; Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4631, Lot Nos. 001 and 002; and Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4644, Lot Nos. 009 an | AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
|
220448
| 2 | | Resolution of Intention to Vacate Streets - Portions of Griffith Street and Hudson Avenue as Part of 900 Innes Avenue Park Development and Public Utility Easements at 700 Innes Avenue | Resolution | Passed | Resolution declaring the intention of the Board to order the vacation of 1) a portion of Griffith Street and a portion of Hudson Avenue, generally bounded by Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4629A, Lot No. 010, a portion of Hudson Avenue at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4646, Lot Nos. 001, 002, and 003, a portion of Innes Avenue and a portion of Griffith Street at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4645, Lot No. 010, a portion of Hudson Avenue at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4630, Lot No. 002, and a portion of Galvez Avenue (“the Street Vacation Area”), to facilitate the development of the 900 Innes Avenue (India Basin) Park Development; 2) an unaccepted ten-foot public utility easements affecting portions of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4607, Lot Nos. 024 and 025; Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4620, Lot Nos. 001 and 002 (with Lot No. 002 more recently referred to by the City as Lot Nos. 004 and 005); Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4621, Lot No. 100; Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4606, Lot No. 026; Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4631, Lot Nos. 001 and 002; and Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4644, Lot Nos. 009 an | RECOMMENDED AS AMENDED AS A COMMITTEE REPORT | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
220450
| 1 | | Street Vacation Order and Interdepartmental Property Transfer for 900 Innes Avenue Park Development - Public Utility Easement Vacation Order for India Basin Mixed-Use Project at 700 Innes Avenue | Ordinance | Passed | Ordinance 1) ordering the street vacation of a portion of Griffith Street and a portion of Hudson Avenue, generally bounded by Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4629A, Lot No. 010, a portion of Hudson Avenue at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4646, Lot Nos. 001, 002, and 003, a portion of Innes Avenue and a portion of Griffith Street at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4645, Lot No. 010, a portion of Hudson Avenue at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4630, Lot No. 002, and a portion of Galvez Avenue (“the Street Vacation Area”), to facilitate the development of the 900 Innes Avenue (India Basin) Park Development; 2) ordering the vacation of unaccepted ten-foot public utility easements affecting portions of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4607, Lot Nos. 024 and 025; Block 4620, Lot Nos. 001 and 002 (Lot No. 002 more recently referred to by the City as Lot Nos. 004 and 005); Block No. 4621, Lot No. 100; Block No. 4606, Lot No. 026; Block No. 4631, Lot Nos. 001 and 002; and Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4644, Lot Nos. 009 and 010, to facilitate the development of the India Basin Mixed-Use Project; 3) approving th | REFERRED WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
|
220342
| 1 | | Planning Code - Fire-Damaged Liquor Stores in North Beach Neighborhood Commercial District | Ordinance | Passed | Ordinance amending the Planning Code to extend the time, from three to six years from the date of a fire, for a temporary closure of a liquor store in the North Beach Neighborhood Commercial District (NCD) as a result of the fire to not result in an abandonment of such use, and for the relocation of such use to another location in the North Beach NCD to not require a new Conditional Use permit; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. | RECOMMENDED AS COMMITTEE REPORT | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
|
211300
| 2 | | Planning Code, Zoning Map - Group Housing Special Use District | Ordinance | Passed | Ordinance amending the Planning Code to create the Group Housing Special Use District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. | RECOMMENDED | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
|
220446
| 5 | | Planning, Administrative, Subdivision Codes; Zoning Map - Density Exception in Residential Districts | Ordinance | Failed | Ordinance amending the Planning Code to rezone all Residential, One Family (RH-1) zoning districts, except for Residential, One Family, Detached (RH-1(D)) districts, to Residential, Two Family (RH-2) zoning districts; to rezone the RH-1(D) districts to a new class of residential district called Residential, Two Family, Detached (RH-2(D)) districts; and to provide a density limit exception to permit up to four dwelling units per lot, and up to six dwelling units per lot in Corner Lots, in all RH (Residential, House) zoning districts, subject to certain requirements, including among others the replacement of protected units; amending the Administrative Code to require new dwelling units constructed pursuant to the density limit exception to be subject to the rent increase limitations of the Rent Ordinance; amending the Subdivision Code to authorize a subdivider that is constructing new dwelling units pursuant to the density exception to submit an application for condominium conversion or a condominium map that includes the existing dwelling units and the new dwelling units that constit | AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
|
220446
| 6 | | Planning, Administrative, Subdivision Codes; Zoning Map - Density Exception in Residential Districts | Ordinance | Failed | Ordinance amending the Planning Code to rezone all Residential, One Family (RH-1) zoning districts, except for Residential, One Family, Detached (RH-1(D)) districts, to Residential, Two Family (RH-2) zoning districts; to rezone the RH-1(D) districts to a new class of residential district called Residential, Two Family, Detached (RH-2(D)) districts; and to provide a density limit exception to permit up to four dwelling units per lot, and up to six dwelling units per lot in Corner Lots, in all RH (Residential, House) zoning districts, subject to certain requirements, including among others the replacement of protected units; amending the Administrative Code to require new dwelling units constructed pursuant to the density limit exception to be subject to the rent increase limitations of the Rent Ordinance; amending the Subdivision Code to authorize a subdivider that is constructing new dwelling units pursuant to the density exception to submit an application for condominium conversion or a condominium map that includes the existing dwelling units and the new dwelling units that constit | AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
220446
| 5 | | Planning, Administrative, Subdivision Codes; Zoning Map - Density Exception in Residential Districts | Ordinance | Failed | Ordinance amending the Planning Code to rezone all Residential, One Family (RH-1) zoning districts, except for Residential, One Family, Detached (RH-1(D)) districts, to Residential, Two Family (RH-2) zoning districts; to rezone the RH-1(D) districts to a new class of residential district called Residential, Two Family, Detached (RH-2(D)) districts; and to provide a density limit exception to permit up to four dwelling units per lot, and up to six dwelling units per lot in Corner Lots, in all RH (Residential, House) zoning districts, subject to certain requirements, including among others the replacement of protected units; amending the Administrative Code to require new dwelling units constructed pursuant to the density limit exception to be subject to the rent increase limitations of the Rent Ordinance; amending the Subdivision Code to authorize a subdivider that is constructing new dwelling units pursuant to the density exception to submit an application for condominium conversion or a condominium map that includes the existing dwelling units and the new dwelling units that constit | RECOMMENDED AS AMENDED | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
211276
| 1 | | Hearing - Review of MOHCD’s BMR Program | Hearing | Filed | Hearing on the review and status of the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development’s (MOHCD) Below Market Rate (BMR) Program, including inquiring about the number of participants in the Program, what Area Median Income’s (AMI) are currently being serviced, the Program’s funding availability, participant demographics, number of units in development, and number of units currently available; and requesting MOHCD to report. | CONTINUED TO CALL OF THE CHAIR | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
|