00:00:09 . >> GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE.
00:00:10 THIS MEETING WILL COME TO ORDER .
00:00:13 >> WELCOME TO THE APRIL 13TH 2026 REGULAR MEETING OF THE
00:00:17 LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OF THE SAN FRANCISCO
00:00:21 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. I AM SUPERVISOR MARINA MELGAR,
00:00:25 CHAIR OF THIS COMMITTEE AND I'M JOINED BY VICE CHAIR SUPERVISOR
00:00:28 CHAN CHEN AND SUPERVISOR BILAL MAHMUD.
00:00:32 THE COMMITTEE CLERK TODAY IS AT JOHN CARROLL AND I ALSO WOULD
00:00:36 LIKE TO THANK JEANETTE ANGELO FROM S.F. CAPTIVE FOR
00:00:41 SUPPORTING US DURING THIS MEETING.
00:00:42 >> MR. CLERK, DO YOU HAVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS?
00:00:45 >> YES, THANK YOU. PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU SILENCED
00:00:48 YOUR CELL PHONES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES YOU'VE
00:00:49 BROUGHT WITH YOU INTO THE CHAMBER TODAY.
00:00:50 IF YOU HAVE ANY DOCUMENTS TO BE INCLUDED AS PART OF ANY OF
00:00:52 TODAY'S FILES YOU CAN SUBMIT THEM DIRECTLY TO ME.
00:00:55 PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON EACH ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
00:00:56 WHEN YOUR ITEM OF INTEREST COMES UP AND PUBLIC COMMENT IS
00:01:00 CALLED PLEASE LINE UP TO SPEAK ALONG YOUR RIGHT HAND SIDE OF
00:01:01 THIS ROOM. ALTERNATIVELY YOU MAY SUBMIT
00:01:03 PUBLIC COMMENT IN WRITING IN EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING
00:01:06 WAYS. FIRST YOU MAY EMAIL YOUR
00:01:07 COMMENTS TO ME AT G O H AND PERIOD C PAYROLL L AT AS F
00:01:11 G OF YOUR G OR YOU MAY SEND YOUR WRITTEN COMMENTS OR US
00:01:15 POSTAL SERVICE TO OUR OFFICE IN CITY HALL.
00:01:18 THE ADDRESS IS A ONE DR. CARLTON B GOOD PLACE ROOM 244
00:01:22 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94102.
00:01:25 IF YOU SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENT IN WRITING I WILL FORWARD YOUR
00:01:26 COMMENTS TO THE MEMBERS OF THIS COMMITTEE AND ALSO INCLUDE YOUR
00:01:30 COMMENTS AS PART OF THE OFFICIAL FILE ON WHICH YOU ARE
00:01:32 COMMENTING. >> ITEMS ON TODAY'S AGENDA ARE
00:01:36 EXPECTED TO APPEAR ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA OF APRIL
00:01:39 21ST 2026 UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
00:01:40 >> THANK YOU SO MUCH MR. CLERK. PLEASE CALL ITEM NUMBER ONE.
00:01:47 >> GENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE IS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
00:01:48 MAP OF THE PLANNING CODE TO CHANGE THE HEIGHT AND BULK
00:01:51 DISTRICTS FOR THE ONE OAK STREET PROJECT TO INCREASE THE
00:01:55 ALLOWED HEIGHT FOR THE PODIUM OF THE BUILDING FROM THE
00:01:58 CURRENT BASE HEIGHT OF 120FT TO 140FT.
00:02:01 AFFIRMING THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECRET DETERMINATION
00:02:04 MAKING FINDINGS OF PUBLIC NECESSITY, CONVENIENCE
00:02:06 AND WELFARE UNDER PLANNING CODE SECTION 302 AND FINDINGS OF
00:02:09 CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN IN THE EIGHT PRIORITY
00:02:12 POLICIES OF PLANNING CODE SECTION ONE A 1.1.
00:02:15 >> THANK YOU SO MUCH. WE WILL HEAR FROM MADISON DAM
00:02:19 FROM SUPERVISOR TALKS OFFICE WHO WILL PRESENT ON THIS ITEM
00:02:23 FOLLOWED BY JOSEPH SAATCHI AND VERONICA FLORES FROM OUR
00:02:28 PLANNING DEPARTMENT. >> WELCOME MS. DAM THANK YOU
00:02:31 CHAIR GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR CHAIR MELGAR VICE CHAIR CHEN
00:02:34 SUPERVISOR MAHMOOD MADISON I'M HERE REPRESENTING SUPERVISOR
00:02:36 DORSEY. THANK YOU FOR HEARING THIS ITEM
00:02:39 TODAY AS OF COURT TV CAN I GET SLIDES UP?
00:02:42 I FIRST WILL WALK YOU THROUGH THE PROJECT AND THEN I WILL
00:02:45 TALK ABOUT THE NEED FOR THE LEGISLATIVE ACTION BEFORE YOU
00:02:46 TODAY. ONE OAK IS ONE OF THE MOST
00:02:50 IMPORTANT SITES IN THE MARKET IN OCTAVIA AREA PLAN AND IT'S A
00:02:53 SIGNIFICANT SHARE OF THE MANY UNITS LONG PROMISED TO THIS
00:02:54 NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS AMENDMENT IS A SMALL BUT
00:02:57 MEANINGFUL CHANGE THAT WILL BRING EVEN MORE UNITS TO THIS
00:03:01 SITE AND ACTIVATE THIS VITAL CORNER.
00:03:02 THE PROJECT WILL BRING ADDITIONAL HOUSING INTO A
00:03:05 NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS WELL SERVED BY TRANSIT ON THE EDGE
00:03:07 OF DOWNTOWN AND THE PROJECT WILL NOT DISPLACE ANY EXISTING
00:03:10 HOUSING HERE YOU CAN SEE HOW THE PROJECT HAS CHANGED FROM
00:03:13 ITS PREVIOUS 2022 DESIGN THE MODIFIED PROJECT WILL HAVE
00:03:17 ADDITIONAL UNITS BRINGING THE TOTAL COUNT TO 541 WITH SOME
00:03:19 MODEST INCREASES IN PARKING, BIKE PARKING AND THE ITEM
00:03:24 REQUIRING THE LEGISLATIVE ACTION TODAY IS THE PODIUM
00:03:25 HEIGHT INCREASE. THERE WILL ALSO BE CONSTRUCTION
00:03:28 OF A NEW PUBLIC PLAZA THIS MODIFIED PROJECT MAINTAINS THE
00:03:31 SAME BUILDING ENVELOPE AS PREVIOUS VERSIONS AND THE 400
00:03:35 FOOT TOWER HEIGHT REMAINS CONSISTENT.
00:03:39 AS I STATED THE INCREASED PODIUM HEIGHT FROM 120 TO 140
00:03:42 IS WHAT NECESSITATES THE LEGISLATIVE ACTION.
00:03:45 THIS AMENDMENT WILL BRING THE PODIUM HEIGHT OF THE PROJECT
00:03:47 IN ALIGNMENT WITH ITS NEIGHBOR AT 30 VENICE.
00:03:50 THIS PROJECT AND ITS CORRESPONDING LEGISLATIVE
00:03:53 AMENDMENT HAVE RECEIVED BROAD COMMUNITY SUPPORT INCLUDING
00:03:54 FROM THE HAYS VALLEY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION
00:03:57 AND MANY PARTNERS IN LABOR. THE SUPERVISOR WOULD LIKE TO
00:04:00 THANK PLANNING STAFF FOR THEIR DILIGENT WORK ON THIS PROJECT
00:04:02 AND THE LEGISLATIVE ITEM PLANNING STAFF AND THE ONE OKT
00:04:05 PROJECT TEAM ARE HERE IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS BEST DIRECTED AT
00:04:08 THEM. >> THANK YOU CHAIR THAT
00:04:09 CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THANK YOU MR. HAMM GOOD
00:04:14 AFTERNOON SUPERVISORS JOSEPH SACKEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
00:04:20 STAFF AFTER HEARING THIS ITEM ON MARCH 19TH THE PLANNING
00:04:23 COMMISSION VOTED 5 TO 1 TO ADOPT TWO RECOMMENDATION FOR
00:04:26 APPROVAL. THIS CONCLUDES THE COMMISSION
00:04:29 REPORT AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
00:04:30 >> THANK YOU. >> THAT'S IT FOR THE PLANNING
00:04:33 DEPARTMENT RIGHT, MS. FLORES OKAY I.
00:04:37 A SUPERVISOR CHEN THANK YOU, CHAIR MALKA I SUPPORT HOUSING
00:04:43 AND I THINK THIS IS THE LOCATION IS IDEAL FOR NEW
00:04:48 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND IT'S WELL SERVED BY PUBLIC TRANSIT.
00:04:52 >> IT'S ALSO PRIMARILY AN EMPTY LOT IN THE AREA OF HIGH RISING
00:04:56 HIGH RISE BUILDINGS BUT IT'S NOT A PERFECT PROJECT.
00:05:00 HOWEVER, THERE'S ABSOLUTELY SOME TRADEOFFS.
00:05:03 I CAN SAY THAT I'M NOT DISAPPOINTED THAT WE WOULD BE
00:05:05 LOSING THE ALL STAR CAFE THE NICEST, MOST PLEASANT PEOPLE
00:05:08 WORKING BEHIND THE LITTLE COUNTER.
00:05:12 >> I WANT TO URGE THE DEVELOPER TO WORK CLOSELY WITH WITH THE
00:05:15 ALL STAR CAFE TO PROVIDE A RELOCATION PLAN AND ASSISTANCE
00:05:19 . >> I'M ALSO DISAPPOINTED BY THE
00:05:20 DEVELOPER IT'S OPTING TO FISH OUT FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR
00:05:24 THE PROPOSED 541 RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
00:05:28 I STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT IT IT'S BETTER FOR OUR CITY TO HAVE A
00:05:32 ON SITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. WHAT REAL MIXED INCOME
00:05:35 COMMUNITIES AT THE VERY LEAST A CITY CAN WITH REAL MIXED INCOME
00:05:41 COMMUNITIES THAT WE CAN LEVERAGE.
00:05:42 BUT AT THE VERY LEAST THE CITY CAN STILL LEVERAGE TO 24
00:05:48 MILLION IN FEES FOR OFFSET 100% AFFORDABLE PROJECTS.
00:05:51 I'M ALSO CURIOUS THAT I UNDERSTAND THE SITE IT'S ALSO
00:05:55 SUBJECT TO THE RECENT CHANGES TO THE MARKET AND OTV
00:05:59 AND OPTAVIA PLAN FEES. CAN SOMEONE FROM THE PLANNING
00:06:03 DEPARTMENT OR WOULD TELL ME THAT WHAT IS THE ACTUAL
00:06:06 FINANCIAL BENEFITS TO THIS PROJECT FROM THEIR FEE
00:06:10 REDUCTIONS? AND I ALSO KNOW THAT THIS
00:06:14 MATTER BEFORE US IT'S A ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS SHOULD INCREASE
00:06:16 TO ALLOW HIGH FOR THE PODIUM OF THE PROJECT AND I WILL BE
00:06:19 VOTING IN SUPPORT OF HIGH COMMISSIONER COULD YOU PERHAPS
00:06:28 REPOSE YOUR QUESTION REGARDING THE QUESTION IT'S I UNDERSTAND
00:06:32 THAT DOES THIS SAY IT'S ALSO PART OF THE RECENT CHANGES TO
00:06:36 THE MARKET AND OTAVIO OTAVIO PLAN FEEDS THAT WAS A FEE
00:06:40 REDUCTIONS FOR IMPACT FEET SO DO WE KNOW ACTUALLY HOW MUCH
00:06:48 FINANCIAL BENEFIT OF THIS PROJECT ACTUALLY BENEFIT FROM
00:06:52 THE FEE REDUCTION THE IMPACT FEE REDUCTIONS IN TERMS OF THE
00:06:53 PRECISE CALCULATIONS OF WHAT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE
00:06:57 PREVIOUS FEES WOULD BE AND NOW I CAN FIND THOSE NUMBERS.
00:07:00 I DON'T HAVE THEM IMMEDIATELY AT HAND BUT I THINK JUST
00:07:03 GENERALLY THE THE LEGISLATION WAS ADOPTED FOR THE OVERALL
00:07:07 PROJECT FEASIBILITY IF THE FEES WERE STILL APPLICABLE THEY
00:07:11 WOULD GO TO INFRASTRUCTURE AND OTHER KIND OF CAPITAL
00:07:15 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
00:07:16 >> GREAT. THANK YOU.
00:07:21 THANK YOU. I DON'T SEE ANYONE ELSE ON THE
00:07:22 ROSTER. I WILL SAY THAT THIS PROJECT
00:07:29 HAS BEEN AROUND FOR A VERY VERY LONG TIME.
00:07:32 >> I THINK I VOTED ON THE FIRST ITERATION AT MANY YEARS AGO
00:07:36 WHEN I WAS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HERE WE ARE
00:07:40 STILL WITHOUT A PROJECT SO HOPEFULLY THIS WILL GET IT
00:07:44 MOVING. >> I ALSO SHARE YOUR FONDNESS
00:07:48 FOR OUR LITTLE DONUT SHOP THAT ALSO MAKES GREAT SANDWICHES.
00:07:52 THERE ARE SO FEW AFFORDABLE OPTIONS IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD
00:07:56 AND I KNOW THAT A LOT OF CITY WORKERS ACTUALLY RELY ON THIS
00:08:00 LITTLE PLACE SO I AGREE. BUT I'M GLAD THAT THIS IS GOING
00:08:07 SO WITH THAT, MR. CLERK, LET'S GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
00:08:10 ITEM PLEASE. >> THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.
00:08:11 LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION WILL NOW HEAR PUBLIC COMMENT
00:08:14 RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE.
00:08:15 PLANNING CODE ZONING MAP CHANGES FOR THE ONE OAK STREET
00:08:18 PROJECT. IF YOU HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR
00:08:19 THIS ITEM PLEASE COME FORWARD TO THE LECTERN AT THIS TIME
00:08:21 AND I'LL START YOUR TIMER. I THANK YOU MR. CLERK MADAM
00:08:26 CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE RUDY GONZALEZ WITH
00:08:29 THE SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES
00:08:30 COUNCIL. WE'RE REALLY TALKING ABOUT
00:08:33 TAKING THE THE ABSTRACTS AND WHAT'S ON PAPER WHICH I
00:08:34 THINK FRUSTRATINGLY WE WE'VE EXPERIENCE RIGHT?
00:08:37 WE HAVE OVER 70,000 UNITS OF ENTITLED HOUSING IN THE
00:08:40 PIPELINE AND WE'RE ALWAYS TALKING I KNOW I'VE SPOKEN WITH
00:08:44 EACH OF YOU INDIVIDUALLY ABOUT THIS IN YOUR DISTRICTS
00:08:47 AND CITYWIDE AND THIS GIVES US A REAL OPPORTUNITY NOT JUST FOR
00:08:51 THIS PROJECT YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR I THINK FROM A MY FROM MY
00:08:52 COLLEAGUES ABOUT THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES
00:08:55 AND THE REVENUE OPPORTUNITIES AND ALL THE GREAT THINGS THAT
00:08:59 COME ALONG WITH THIS KIND OF INVESTMENT OR CITY.
00:09:00 BUT I WANT TO DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO MID-MARKET.
00:09:03 I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THAT SUPERVISOR DORSEY'S OFFICE
00:09:05 IS HERE AND SUPPORTS THIS. WE CERTAINLY HAVE SEEN
00:09:08 UNDERUTILIZED GROUND FLOOR RETAIL SPACE IN THE MID-MARKET
00:09:11 CORRIDOR. EVEN SPURS AS LOCATION WAS
00:09:15 SOMETHING OF A MATTER OF CONTENTION WITH THIS BODY
00:09:18 BECAUSE WE'RE REALLY FOCUSED ON WHAT'S HAPPENING OR NOT
00:09:22 HAPPENING IN THIS MID-MARKET CORRIDOR.
00:09:23 IT'S ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL. IT'S TRANSIT ORIENTED WHICH I
00:09:27 KNOW IS ALSO ON YOUR AGENDA LATER.
00:09:30 BUT THIS IS A KEY AREA AND THE INVESTMENT AT THIS SCALE WILL
00:09:33 NOT ONLY PRODUCE THE BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ONE
00:09:36 PROJECT BUT THIS IS THE TYPE OF PROJECT THAT WILL MAKE DIRT FLY
00:09:40 UP AND DOWN THAT CORRIDOR. SO WE HAVE OTHER PROJECTS
00:09:44 IN THE WORK THAT ARE ALL WATCHING TO SEE WHAT'S THE
00:09:45 EMERALD FUND GOING TO DO, WHAT ARE THE TRADES GOING TO DO,
00:09:48 WHAT'S CITY HALL GOING TO DO SO THIS VOTE IS IMPORTANT FOR THIS
00:09:52 PROJECT BUT IT'S ALSO VERY SYMBOLIC IN TERMS OF HOW THE
00:09:55 CITY IS GOING TO TAKE ACTION WITH URGENCY IN THE MID-MARKET
00:09:59 SPAN. SO RESPECTFULLY URGE YOU TO
00:10:00 UPHOLD THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REPORT
00:10:03 AND RECOMMENDATION AND PLEASE HELP US MOVE THE PROJECT
00:10:04 FORWARD. THANK YOU.
00:10:07 >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. NEXT SPEAKER PLEASE.
00:10:10 >> GOOD AFTERNOON MEMBERS SO THE SAN FRANCISCO LAND
00:10:15 AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY
00:10:16 TO SPEAK TODAY. MY NAME IS ANTHONY MINIVER
00:10:19 AND I'M AN ORGANIZER WITH THE NORCAL STATE CARPENTERS LOCAL
00:10:22 UNIT 22 HERE IN THE BEAUTIFUL CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO.
00:10:25 I'M SPEAKING TODAY ON BEHALF OF MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS WHO
00:10:27 LIVE AND WORK IN THIS CITY STRONG SUPPORT OF 5000 MARKET
00:10:31 STREET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ONE OAK I WAS BORN AND RAISED
00:10:34 IN SAN FRANCISCO AND CONTINUED TO RESIDE HERE.
00:10:38 IT IS ONLY SINCE I BECAME AN ORGANIZER THAT I REALIZED A
00:10:40 SUCCESSFUL CAREER AS A UNION CARPENTER IN SAN FRANCISCO OR
00:10:42 ANYWHERE FOR THAT MATTER RELIES A LOT ON GOOD STORES WHERE ALL
00:10:46 GOOD STORES ARE DEVELOPMENT HERE AND RECOGNIZE THAT THE
00:10:50 QUALITY AND STANDARDS WE WANT TO ACHIEVE CAN ONLY BE DELIVER
00:10:54 WITH A UNIQUE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MRA FUND INC.
00:10:57 COMMITTED TO USING UNION LABOR ON THIS PROJECT IS CRITICAL.
00:11:01 THAT COMMITMENT DIRECTLY TRANSLATES INTO CREATING GOOD
00:11:03 UNION JOBS FOR SAN FRANCISCO INCLUDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR
00:11:06 WOMEN AND MINORITIES TO BEGIN OR CONTINUE THEIR CAREER IN THE
00:11:10 CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. FOR OUR MEMBERS THIS MEANS
00:11:13 STRONG WAGES, FAMILY SUPPORTING BENEFITS AND CAREER PATHWAYS
00:11:17 THAT SUSTAIN HOUSEHOLDS AND BUILD THE NEXT GENERATION
00:11:20 OF SKILLED CARPENTERS ALL WHILE DELIVERING THE HIGH STANDARDS
00:11:25 OF SAFETY AND CRAFTMANSHIP. THE HOUSE IN DEVELOPMENT
00:11:28 REPRESENTS A MEANINGFUL STEP TOWARDS ECONOMIC RECOVERY
00:11:32 AND REVITALIZATION. EMERALD POINT INC. HAVE
00:11:33 DEMONSTRATED FROM THE OUTSET A COMMITMENT TO DOING THE RIGHT
00:11:37 THING BY WORKING COLLABORATIVELY WITH ORGANIZED
00:11:40 LABOR. THERE ARE PLENTY OF LOCAL
00:11:41 DEVELOPERS WHO ARE WILLING TO MAKE THIS COMMITMENT ON BEHALF
00:11:44 OF THE NORCAL STATE CARPENTERS LOCAL UNION TO I RESPECTFULLY
00:11:48 URGE THE COMMISSION TO SUPPORT AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED
00:11:49 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AT 1500 MARK STREET.
00:11:52 >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
00:11:53 NEXT SPEAKER PLEASE. >> GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIR
00:11:59 AND SUPERVISORS. MY NAME IS JOE SANDERS.
00:12:02 I'M A REPRESENTATIVE WITH DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 PAINTERS
00:12:06 AND DRYWALL FINISHERS LOCAL 913.
00:12:06 AND I'M HERE TODAY WITH THE BUILDING TRADES.
00:12:10 WE'RE HERE TO SUPPORT THE 100 PROJECT AND ASK YOU TO MOVE IT
00:12:13 FORWARD. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN IN THE
00:12:15 SYSTEM FOR A LONG TIME. IT'S GONE THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL
00:12:17 REVIEW. IT'S BEEN APPROVED HERE BEFORE.
00:12:20 IT'S BEEN REVISED AT A CERTAIN POINT.
00:12:23 WE'VE GOT TO ASK WHEN DO WE ACTUALLY BUILD SAN FRANCISCO?
00:12:27 TALKS A LOT ABOUT THE HOUSING CRISIS.
00:12:30 BUT PART OF THE PROBLEM ISN'T JUST WHAT WE APPROVE.
00:12:32 IT'S WHAT ACTUALLY GETS BUILT. THERE ARE A LOT OF PROJECTS
00:12:35 SITTING ON PAPER RIGHT NOW. ONE OAK IS READY.
00:12:38 IT'S IN THE RIGHT PLACE RIGHT ON TOP OF TRANSIT AND BRINGS
00:12:42 HUNDREDS OF NEW HOMES. IF A PROJECT LIKE THIS CAN'T
00:12:45 MOVE FORWARD AFTER ALL THIS TIME THEN IT'S HARD TO SAY WHAT
00:12:47 CAN. WE NEED TO START SHOWING THAT
00:12:49 WHEN A PROJECT GOES THROUGH THE PROCESS AND MEETS THE RULES IT
00:12:53 CAN ACTUALLY HAPPEN. WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOU TO
00:12:57 SUPPORT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MOVE FORWARD THIS PROJECT.
00:12:58 >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
00:13:01 SPEAKER PLEASE ASSURE MEMBERS. MY NAME IS WALTER ORIANA.
00:13:09 I'M WITH LOCAL 300 PLUS AND SOME MASON SPOKE WITH 300
00:13:15 AND I AM HERE TO FEEL FEEL. I MEAN ONE SECOND I JUST WANT
00:13:23 TO SPEAK TO THE BIGGER PICTURE RIGHT NOW.
00:13:26 ONE OAK HAS BEEN WORKED ON FOR YEARS.
00:13:30 IT'S BEEN REVIEWED, CHANGED APPROVED AND STILL NOT BUILT.
00:13:35 WE SEE THIS A LOT IN SAN FRANCISCO PROJECT GROWTH
00:13:38 THROUGH THE PROCESS BUT THEY NEVER BUT THEY DON'T GET TO THE
00:13:42 FINISH LINE. THAT CREATES A LOT OF
00:13:46 UNCERTAINTY FOR DEVELOPERS FOR THE CITY, ESPECIALLY FOR
00:13:50 WORKERS BECAUSE OF US. THESE PROJECTS AREN'T ABSTRACT.
00:13:56 THEIR JOBS, THEIR CAREERS, THEIR WHETHER PEOPLE CAN STAY
00:14:01 HERE AND MAKE A LIVING. AT SOME POINT THE PROCESS HAS
00:14:05 TO BE SOMETHING. IF A PROJECT DOESN'T WHAT IT'S
00:14:13 SUPPOSED TO DO IT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD.
00:14:17 THIS IS ONE OF THE MOMENTS WHERE THE CITY CAN SHOW THAT
00:14:18 APPROVALS MATTER AND THE PROJECT CAN ACTUALLY GET BUILT
00:14:25 . WE ASK YOU TO SUPPORT THIS
00:14:25 PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION
00:14:29 AND MOVE THIS FORWARD. >> THANK YOU.
00:14:31 THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. >> NEXT SPEAKER PLEASE.
00:14:36 >> GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIR AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS.
00:14:40 MY NAME IS ISRAEL VARGAS. I'M A REPRESENTATIVE WITH
00:14:44 PLASTERS AND CEMENT MASONS LOCAL 300.
00:14:46 WE SEE THIS AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A GOOD IDEA FEASIBLE
00:14:51 AND TRANSLATE THAT INTO OPPORTUNITY FOR WORKERS.
00:14:57 WORKERS WHO CAN FEED THEIR FAMILIES THROUGHOUT THIS
00:15:00 PROJECT. WORKERS WHO NEED AFFORDABLE
00:15:01 HOUSING. PLEASE SUPPORT THIS PROJECT
00:15:09 AND MOVE FORWARD. THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGREED
00:15:13 WITH US. >> WE HOPE YOU WILL TOO.
00:15:17 >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
00:15:18 SPEAK UP PLEASE. >> GOOD AFTERNOON.
00:15:23 SUPERVISORS MARK GLEASON SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE
00:15:25 TEAMSTERS. WE'RE VERY PROUD TO BE A PART
00:15:28 OF THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL
00:15:31 . OUR MEMBERS OF COURSE DELIVER
00:15:32 THE CONCRETE AGGREGATE AND OTHER SUPPLIES.
00:15:35 THESE DEVELOPMENTS ARE VERY IMPORTANT AND OF COURSE
00:15:39 CONSTRUCTING HOMES FOR FOUR SAN FRANCISCANS TO REMAIN HERE
00:15:45 IN THE CITY AND TO REMAIN WITH GOOD PAYING JOBS IS VERY
00:15:49 IMPORTANT. SO AGAIN, WE VERY MUCH SUPPORT
00:15:50 YOU MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS RECOMMENDATION.
00:15:53 >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
00:15:56 NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE. >> GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIR
00:16:04 AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS. MY NAME IS EDDIE REYES,
00:16:05 PRESIDENT OF IRONWORKERS LOCAL 377 HERE IN SAN FRANCISCO.
00:16:07 WE SUPPORT ONE OAK BECAUSE IT'S EXACTLY THE KIND OF PROJECT THE
00:16:11 CITY HAS BEEN PLANNING FOR. THIS SITE MARKING VENICE IS ONE
00:16:17 OF THE BIGGEST TRANSIT HUBS IN SAN FRANCISCO.
00:16:18 IF WE'RE SERIOUS ABOUT BUILDING TRANSIT NEAR HOUSING NEAR
00:16:22 TRANSIT THIS IS WHERE IT SHOULD HAPPEN.
00:16:25 >> THE CITY HAS SPENT YEARS PUTTING THESE PLANS IN PLACE.
00:16:29 ZONING DENSITY ALL OF IT. THIS PROJECT FOLLOWS THOSE
00:16:33 RULES. IT'S NOT ASKING FOR SOMETHING
00:16:37 OUTSIDE THE SYSTEM. IT'S WHAT THE SYSTEM HAS
00:16:40 DESIGNED TO PRODUCE. SO THE QUESTION HERE ISN'T
00:16:43 WHETHER THIS IS THE RIGHT PLACE.
00:16:44 IT CLEARLY IS. THE QUESTION IS WHETHER WE'RE
00:16:47 GOING TO FOLLOW THROUGH ON THE PLANS WE'VE ALREADY ADOPTED.
00:16:51 FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE THIS IS EXACTLY THE KIND OF PROJECT WE
00:16:52 SHOULD BE MOVING FORWARD WITH. WE ASKED YOU TO SUPPORT THE
00:16:56 PLANNING COMMISSION AND THAT THIS ONE MOVE FORWARD.
00:16:59 THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
00:17:03 NEXT SPEAKER PLEASE. GOOD AFTERNOON.
00:17:10 MEMBERS OF THE LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE.
00:17:13 MY NAME IS SHAWN WHITFIELD. I'M AN ASSISTANT PORTFOLIO
00:17:15 MANAGER FOR WASHINGTON CAPITAL ,A 100% EMPLOYEE OWNED
00:17:18 INVESTMENT MANAGER REPRESENTING MOSTLY UNION BUILDING TRADE
00:17:22 PENSION FUNDS. I'M A FORMER RESIDENT OF SAN
00:17:25 FRANCISCO AND CURRENTLY OFFICE IN THE FINANCIAL DISTRICT HERE
00:17:28 IN THE CITY. OUR FIRM INVESTS IN AND
00:17:29 FINANCES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE
00:17:32 COUNTRY. I'VE BEEN EXTREMELY ACTIVE
00:17:34 IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND SAN FRANCISCO SPECIFICALLY OVER THE
00:17:37 LAST 20 PLUS YEARS. SINCE 2002 OUR FUNDS HAVE BEEN
00:17:40 INVOLVED IN 13 LARGE PROJECTS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WITH
00:17:46 FIVE OF THEM IN SAN FRANCISCO. USING VERY ROUGH WAGE
00:17:47 ASSUMPTIONS AND HARD COST BREAKDOWN, WE ESTIMATE THAT
00:17:51 THESE PROJECTS HAVE CREATED OVER 4 MILLION LABOR HOURS FOR
00:17:53 OUR UNION CLIENTS. OUR FIRM MANAGES THE FUND THAT
00:17:57 OWNS THE ONE OAK STREET PROJECT AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH
00:18:01 GENERAL FUND SB SINCE 2023 TO RE ENTITLE IT FOR MORE DENSITY.
00:18:04 THE TEAM IS AN EXCELLENT JOB BALANCING FORM AND FUNCTION TO
00:18:08 CREATE A PROJECT THAT WOULD PROVIDE UP TO 541 UNITS OF MUCH
00:18:11 NEEDED HOUSING TO THE CITY. IN MY PRIOR LIFE I WORKED FOR A
00:18:15 LARGE UNION CONTRACTOR AS A PROJECT MANAGER
00:18:18 AND SUPERINTENDENT AND SAW FIRSTHAND THE POSITIVE IMPACT
00:18:20 THAT A PROJECT LIKE THIS CAN HAVE ON THE MEN AND WOMEN OF
00:18:23 THE BUILDING TRADES AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT LARGE BRINGING
00:18:26 SHORT TERM AND LONG TERM JOBS. THE PROJECT AND THE
00:18:30 NEIGHBORHOOD. MY ASKS TODAY THAT YOU SUPPORT
00:18:31 THE EXPANSION OF THIS PROJECT AS PROPOSED.
00:18:34 SUPPORTING ONE OAK IS NOT ONLY ADDING MORE MUCH NEEDED HOUSING
00:18:37 ON AN UNDERUTILIZED SITE, IT IS ALSO SUPPORTING UNION WORKERS
00:18:42 HERE IN THE BAY AREA AND INVESTMENTS IN UNION FUNDS.
00:18:43 THANK YOU AND YOUR STAFF FOR YOUR TIME AND THOUGHTFUL
00:18:46 CONSIDERATION OF THIS PROJECT. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
00:18:49 NEXT WEEK A PLACE. >> GOOD AFTERNOON SUPERVISORS.
00:18:57 >> I'M BRANDON BROCKMAN WITH SPRINKLER FITTERS LOCAL 43
00:18:58 AND I'M ALSO A DELEGATE WITH THE SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING
00:19:01 TRADES. WE SUPPORT ONE OAK BECAUSE FOR
00:19:03 US THIS IS ABOUT JOBS AND IT'S ABOUT HOUSING.
00:19:06 >> THIS PROJECT MEANS REAL WORK UNION JOBS.
00:19:10 APPRENTICES GETTING HOURS. PEOPLE BEING ABLE TO STAY
00:19:12 IN THE INDUSTRY AND ALSO STAY IN THE CITY.
00:19:14 >> RIGHT NOW A LOT OF PROJECTS AREN'T MOVING.
00:19:18 >> AND WHEN PROJECTS STALL THAT HITS WORK.
00:19:21 WORKING PEOPLE FIRST IT MEANS FEWER OPPORTUNITIES, FEWER
00:19:25 PAYCHECKS AND A LOT OF UNCERTAINTY.
00:19:26 AT THE SAME TIME WE ALL KNOW WE NEED MORE HOUSING PROJECTS LIKE
00:19:30 THIS DO BOTH. THEY CREATE JOBS NOW
00:19:33 AND HOUSING FOR THE LONG TERM. AND JUST AS IMPORTANT, MOVING
00:19:38 THIS FORWARD SENDS A SIGNAL TO SAN FRANCISCO.
00:19:41 IT SENDS A SIGNAL THAT SAN FRANCISCO IS STILL A PLACE
00:19:44 WHERE THINGS CAN GET BUILT THAT MATTERS FOR WORKERS, FOR THE
00:19:48 INDUSTRY AND FOR THE CITY'S RECOVERY.
00:19:49 WE ASKED YOU TO PLEASE MOVE THIS PROJECT FORWARD.
00:19:52 >> THANK YOU GUYS FOR YOUR TIME .
00:19:55 >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. NEXT WEEK A PLACE THANK YOU.
00:19:59 MY NAME IS JOHN CARUSO. I'M A BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE
00:20:03 FOR THE PLUMBERS AND STEAM FITTERS LOCAL 38 HERE IN THE
00:20:05 CITY AS WELL AS AS OUR UNION HALL BEING ACROSS THE STREET
00:20:09 FROM THE PROPOSED PROJECT. YOU KNOW A PROJECT LIKE THIS IT
00:20:17 CREATES JOBS NOT JUST FOR CONSTRUCTION WORKERS.
00:20:21 IT CREATES JOBS. YOU KNOW, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
00:20:22 DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
00:20:25 IF WE'RE CREATING JOBS AND WE'RE CREATING HOUSING
00:20:29 IN SAN FRANCISCO AT A SPOT LIKE THAT, LOCAL 38 IS ASKING YOU TO
00:20:32 MOVE MOVE THIS PROJECT FORWARD. THANK YOU.
00:20:36 >> THANK YOU FOR COMMENTS. NEXT SPEAKER PLEASE.
00:20:39 >> GOOD AFTERNOON MEMBERS. ALEX LANSBERG RESEARCH
00:20:41 AND ADVOCACY DIRECTOR WITH THE ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY.
00:20:44 I WANT TO ASSOCIATE MYSELF WITH ALL THE COMMENTS THAT YOU'VE
00:20:45 HEARD BEFORE. I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY POINT
00:20:48 IN MY REPEATING THEM. I DO WANT TO UNDERSCORE A
00:20:49 COUPLE POINTS WE HEARD FROM WE HEARD FROM A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT
00:20:52 TRADE PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROJECT
00:20:56 AND I THINK PART OF WHAT I HOPE YOU CAN TAKE FROM THIS MOMENT
00:20:59 IS THAT GETTING A PROJECT LIKE THIS OUT OF THE GROUND TAKES AN
00:21:03 EXTRAORDINARY AMOUNT OF COORDINATION AND COOPERATION
00:21:06 BETWEEN A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT SKILL TRADES.
00:21:07 SO WE SEE CARPENTERS HERE. THEY COMPRISE A THIRD OF THE
00:21:11 HOURS WE SEE ELECTRICAL PLUMBING.
00:21:14 WHEN I SAY SHEET METAL BUT IRON WORKERS, SPRINKLER FITTERS
00:21:16 THAT'S ABOUT ANOTHER 35% 40% OF THE HOURS AND THEN WITH THE
00:21:19 BALANCE BEING THE OTHER BUILDING TRADES AFFILIATES.
00:21:23 BUT WHAT THIS SHOWS IS JUST REALLY THE THE IMPORTANCE OF
00:21:30 KEEPING THE KEEPING EVERYTHING IN OUR MIND AS A COMPLETE
00:21:34 PACKAGE IS THAT IS THAT WHEN PROJECTS LIKE THIS MOVE FORWARD
00:21:38 THEY DO CREATE TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF OPPORTUNITIES.
00:21:41 THEY CREATE APPRENTICESHIP OPPORTUNITIES AS WE HEARD.
00:21:45 AND THEY ALLOW A DIVERSE ECONOMIC ECOSYSTEM TO CONTINUE
00:21:46 TO THRIVE HERE IN SAN FRANCISCO.
00:21:49 >> SO I AM CERTAIN YOU WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS AND I LOOK
00:21:53 FORWARD TO SEEING THIS COME OUT OF THE GROUND.
00:21:54 >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
00:21:57 NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE. >> HELLO MEMBERS MY NAME IS
00:22:01 DAVID KOO. I'M A RESIDENT A LOWER HEAT.
00:22:04 I'VE LIVED IN SAN FRANCISCO FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS AND JUST
00:22:08 WANTED TO ADVOCATE FOR THIS PROJECT AT VENICE AND MARKET.
00:22:11 I'M ALSO A TRAINED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND URBAN DESIGNER.
00:22:15 AND I THINK THIS IS A PERFECT AREA TO ADD HIGH DENSITY
00:22:17 HOUSING NEXT TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION.
00:22:19 SO I WANTED TO JUST ADVOCATE FOR THIS PROJECT.
00:22:20 THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
00:22:23 DO WE HAVE ANYONE ELSE WHO HAS PUBLIC COMMENT FOR AGENDA ITEM
00:22:25 NUMBER ONE? >> MADAM CHAIR OKAY.
00:22:29 PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM IS NOW CLOSED.
00:22:33 >> THANK YOU EVERYONE WHO CAME TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON
00:22:37 THIS REALLY IMPORTANT PROJECT. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION
00:22:40 TO SEND THIS ITEM OUT OF COMMITTEE TO THE FULL BOARD
00:22:45 WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION ON THE MOTION OFFERED BY THE
00:22:48 CHAIR THAT THIS ORDINANCE BE RECOMMENDED TO THE BOARD OF
00:22:49 SUPERVISORS FOR CERTAIN. I AND I REMEMBER MOHAMMED
00:22:52 MAHMOOD I CHAIR MELGAR I MELGAR.
00:22:56 >> MADAM CHAIR THERE ARE THREE EYES THAT MOTION PASSES.
00:22:58 >> THANK YOU. >> LET'S GO TO ITEM NUMBER TWO
00:23:03 PLEASE MR. CLERK. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO IS AN
00:23:06 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TO
00:23:07 AUTHORIZE THE SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
00:23:10 TO ESTABLISH A CURBSIDE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING
00:23:14 STATION PERMIT PROGRAM FOR THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF
00:23:17 CURBSIDE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS ON CITY
00:23:21 SIDEWALKS AND PROVIDE THAT PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO
00:23:24 OBTAIN A SIDEWALK ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF
00:23:26 PUBLIC WORKS. THE ORDINANCE ALSO AMENDS THE
00:23:29 PUBLIC WORKS CODE TO REFLECT THE AUTHORITY OF THE SAN
00:23:32 FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY TO ISSUE
00:23:33 PERMITS FOR THE CURBSIDE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING
00:23:36 STATION PROGRAM AND ALSO AFFIRMS THE PLANNING
00:23:37 DEPARTMENT'S SECURE DETERMINATION.
00:23:43 >> THANK YOU. WE HAVE MS. TAUREAN HERE FROM
00:23:47 MTA WHO WILL GIVE THE PRESENTATION.
00:23:51 >> GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIR MELGAR, VICE CHAIR AND SUPERVISOR OF
00:23:55 MAHMOOD. I'M KATRIN, THE DIRECTOR OF THE
00:23:59 TAXIS ACCESS AND MOBILITY SERVICES TEAM FOR THE FIRST
00:24:02 YEAR. AND I'M HERE WITH MY COLLEAGUE
00:24:05 BRODERICK WHO IS THE LEAD TRANSPORTATION PLANNER ON THE
00:24:09 CURBSIDE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING PILOT.
00:24:13 AND WE WERE LAST BEFORE YOU IN DECEMBER WITH A REPORT OUT
00:24:18 ON THE CURBSIDE ELECTRIC VEHICLE FEASIBLE STUDY AND AN
00:24:22 UPDATE ON THE EV CHARGING PILOT.
00:24:26 >> TODAY WE'RE PLEASED TO BE BEFORE YOU AS WE HEAD INTO
00:24:30 CLIMATE WEEK. AND WE'RE HERE TO PROVIDE A
00:24:34 BRIEF PRESENTATION AND TO REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL TO
00:24:38 AUTHORIZE THE S.F. MTA TO ESTABLISH THE LONG TERM
00:24:39 CURBSIDE EV CHARGING PROGRAM. >> I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT THAT
00:24:43 THIS IS A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT ACROSS THE CITY FAMILY WE WORK
00:24:47 VERY CLOSELY WITH PUBLIC WORKS THE SAN FRANCISCO ENVIRONMENT
00:24:51 DEPARTMENT AND THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OFFICE OF
00:24:55 DISABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY. THIS IS A PRIORITY FOR THE
00:24:59 MAYOR AND PRESIDENT MANDEL MEN WHO HAVE CO-SPONSORED THIS
00:25:02 LEGISLATION. AND AS A TEAM EFFORT WE'RE
00:25:07 BUILDING ON EXISTING EXPERIENCE LESSONS LEARNED AND A MOTIVATED
00:25:11 AND COMMITTED TEAM. AND WE'RE EXCITED TO BE PART OF
00:25:15 THE CLIMATE CHANGE SOLUTION. >> SO IN SUMMARY TODAY WE'RE
00:25:22 ASKING FOR YOU TO AMEND THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TO
00:25:23 AUTHORIZE THE MTA TO ESTABLISH THE PERMANENT CURBSIDE ELECTRIC
00:25:30 VEHICLE OR EV CHARGING PROGRAM TO AUTHORIZE THE S.F. MTA TO
00:25:34 ISSUE PERMITS TO ALLOW INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF
00:25:38 CURBSIDE EV CHARGING STATIONS ON CITY SIDEWALKS.
00:25:42 AND TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM
00:25:46 PUBLIC WORKS WHICH WILL BE REPLACED IF APPROVED AND WITH
00:25:51 THE MTA ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMITS.
00:25:54 THERE HAVE BEEN A FEW ADDITIONAL PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
00:25:55 TO THE ORDINANCE AND I'VE INCLUDED A COUPLE SLIDES AT THE
00:25:58 END OF THE PRESENTATION SO WE CAN WALK THROUGH THOSE AS WELL
00:26:09 . >> THE CURBSIDE ELECTRIC
00:26:10 VEHICLE CHARGING PROGRAM IS ONE IMPORTANT PART OF SFM T'S
00:26:13 LARGER VISION OF SUPPORTING THE ECONOMY AND COMBATING CLIMATE
00:26:17 CHANGE BY OFFERING LOW EMISSION PUBLIC TRANSIT ON OUR MUNI
00:26:21 SYSTEM AND SUPPORTING THE RESILIENCY OF THE CITY'S
00:26:25 INFRASTRUCTURE AS WE TRANSITION TO ZERO EMISSION VEHICLES.
00:26:32 >> >> WITH MUNI LOOKING AT THE BIG PICTURE WHILE THE
00:26:37 TRANSPORTATION SECTOR IS THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR OF
00:26:40 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN CALIFORNIA, WE ARE VERY
00:26:44 PROUD THAT THE MUNI RUNS THE GREENEST FLEET IN NORTH AMERICA
00:26:47 AND EMITS LESS THAN 2% OF TRANSPORTATION SECTOR EMISSIONS
00:26:51 IN SAN FRANCISCO PARKING GARAGES.
00:26:55 >> SO IN ADDITION TO CREATING THIS PERMIT PROGRAM, THE MTA
00:26:59 ALSO HAS ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING IN OUR OFF STREET
00:27:04 PARKING GARAGES AS WE CURRENTLY HAVE 110 EV PARKING STALLS THAT
00:27:11 ARE SERVICED BY 55 DUAL PORT LEVEL TWO CHARGERS.
00:27:17 AND SO THIS CURBSIDE PROGRAM WILL BE IN ADDITION TO THESE
00:27:21 CHARGERS. AND THEN WE'RE ALSO HAPPY TO BE
00:27:26 PART OF A GRANT THAT WAS SUCCESSFULLY WILL BE WAS
00:27:30 SUCCESSFULLY ACHIEVED BY THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE TO
00:27:34 HELP TRANSITION THE CITY'S NON-REVENUE VEHICLE FLEET
00:27:40 TOWARDS ZERO EMISSION VEHICLES. AND MTA IS PART OF THAT AND WE
00:27:45 WE WILL BE TRANSITIONING AND ADDING 140 CHARGERS THAT
00:27:49 WILL BE INSTALLED IN MUNI FACILITIES.
00:27:52 SO AND NOW I'M GOING TO ASK BRODERICK POLLARD TO DO THE
00:27:57 NEXT FEW SLIDES. THANK YOU.
00:28:02 >> THANK YOU. DIRECTOR TURIN GOOD AFTERNOON
00:28:04 SUPERVISORS MY NAME IS BRODERICK PAULO.
00:28:07 I'M A PLANNER IN THE PARKING AND CURB MANAGEMENT GROUP AT
00:28:10 MTA AND I'VE BEEN SERVING AS THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR THE
00:28:14 PILOT PROGRAM. >> I'LL BEGIN BY SAYING TO
00:28:15 REACH OUR GOALS WE MUST ENSURE THE RIGHT CHARGING
00:28:18 INFRASTRUCTURE IS IN PLACE. TODAY WE HAVE ABOUT 1300
00:28:22 CHARGERS PUBLICLY AVAILABLE IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH LEAVES
00:28:26 ROOM TO INSTALL 450 MORE CHARGERS TO REACH OUR 2030
00:28:31 GOALS. AND I'M HAPPY TO SAY THAT MTA
00:28:34 HAS 250 LEVEL TWO CHARGERS COMING DOWN THE PIPELINE TO BE
00:28:39 INSTALLED IN OUR GARAGES. THIS WILL MAKE A SIGNIFICANT
00:28:40 CONTRIBUTION IN TO REACHING OUR 2030 GOALS.
00:28:44 SO THIS IS WHERE CURBSIDE CHARGING CAN FILL THE GAP.
00:28:47 IT OFFERS THE CLOSEST OPTION TO AN AT HOME CHARGING EXPERIENCE
00:28:51 FOR THE MANY OF SAN FRANCISCANS WHO RENT OR LIVE IN MULTIFAMILY
00:28:54 UNIT HOUSING WITHOUT DEDICATED PARKING.
00:28:58 WE'RE AIMING TO INSTALL ABOUT 100 OF THESE CURBSIDE CHARGERS.
00:29:02 OF COURSE THIS IS A FLOOR AND NOT A CEILING.
00:29:05 THE PROGRAM WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR DEMAND AND ADJUST
00:29:09 ACCORDINGLY. >> CURBSIDE WILL JUST BE ONE
00:29:12 SMALL PIECE OF THE PUZZLE TO INCREASE CHARGING ACCESS
00:29:15 THROUGHOUT THE CITY. A ROBUST NETWORK MUST ALSO
00:29:16 INCLUDE HOME WORKPLACE FLEET AND FAST CHARGING HUBS.
00:29:26 >> THIS BODY OF WORK IS GUIDED BY THE CITY'S CLEAN
00:29:30 TRANSPORTATION COMMITMENTS IN THE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN AS
00:29:31 WELL AS THE EV ROADMAP. OUR VISION IS SIMPLE SUPPORTING
00:29:35 THE CITY'S ZERO EMISSION GOALS IMPROVES AIR QUALITY FOR
00:29:39 EVERYONE WHO LIVES WORKS AND MOVES THROUGH SAN
00:29:43 FRANCISCO. SO HOW DID WE GET TO WHERE WE
00:29:44 ARE TODAY? WELL, WE STARTED OFF WITH A
00:29:47 FEASIBILITY STUDY TO EXPLORE WHETHER IT WAS FEASIBLE FROM AN
00:29:50 OPERATIONAL, FINANCIAL AND REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE TO
00:29:54 INSTALL, MAINTAIN AND OPERATE A PUBLIC FACING CHARGING NETWORK
00:29:58 AT THE CURB. THE STUDY IDENTIFIED THE RISKS
00:29:59 AND OPPORTUNITIES OF OPERATING A CURBSIDE NETWORK
00:30:03 AND IDENTIFIED PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
00:30:06 TO HELP ADVANCE THE NETWORK BEYOND THE CURRENT PILOT PHASE.
00:30:10 >> THEN CAME OUR 2024 TECHNOLOGY AGNOSTIC PILOT
00:30:13 PROGRAM. THE PILOT ALLOWED US TO TEST A
00:30:17 VARIETY OF CURBSIDE CHARGING MODELS AT A HANDFUL OF
00:30:20 LOCATIONS TO INFORM THE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OF THE
00:30:24 FUTURE PERMANENT PROGRAM. ALL THIS SAID LET US NOT FORGET
00:30:28 AS A TRANSIT FIRST CITY WE PRIORITIZE WALKING, BIKING,
00:30:32 ROLLING AND TAKING TRANSIT BUT AT THE SAME TIME AND COMING
00:30:35 FROM THE ON STREET PARKING GROUP WE RECOGNIZE CARS TO BE A
00:30:39 MAJOR COMPONENT OF OUR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM.
00:30:40 KEEPING IN MIND THAT MANY RESIDENTS, COMMUTERS
00:30:43 AND VISITORS RELY ON VEHICLES SO WHERE VEHICLES ARE NECESSARY
00:30:47 WE AIM TO SUPPORT ZERO EMISSION OPTIONS.
00:30:51 TO FOSTER OUR VISION FOR A FUTURE FILLED WITH CLEAN AIR
00:30:55 AND A STABLE CLIMATE ALL READY TO SHARE A FEW LESSONS LEARNED
00:31:02 FROM THE PILOT. I'LL START BY SAYING SITE
00:31:06 SELECTION IS CHALLENGING AS PROVIDERS NEED TO CONSIDER THE
00:31:10 CURB USE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS POWER CONNECTION
00:31:13 AND COMMUNITY READINESS. >> WE ALSO EXPERIENCE HURDLES
00:31:17 WITH THE ELECTORAL GRID IN TERMS OF ACCESS AND OVERALL
00:31:18 READINESS. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT REMAINS
00:31:22 VITAL TO ENSURE THESE CHARGERS ALIGN WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S
00:31:26 TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES. OF COURSE WE WANT TO BUILD
00:31:30 PUBLIC TRUST THROUGH THIS PROGRAM BY PLANNING WITH THE
00:31:31 COMMUNITY AND NOT HAVING THE COMMUNITY REACTING TO OUR
00:31:34 PLANNING. >> WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO TEST
00:31:37 THREE DIFFERENT CHARGING MODELS WITH OUR THREE APPROVED PILOT
00:31:39 VENDORS. FIRST WE HAVE IT'S ELECTRIC
00:31:41 WHICH USES THE BRING YOUR OWN CORD MODEL AND TAPS INTO OUR
00:31:44 FRONTING PROPERTIES POWER. THIS SITE IS GOING TO CELEBRATE
00:31:48 ITS ONE YEAR BIRTHDAY THIS MONTH.
00:31:51 URBAN EV USES A PEDESTAL CHARGER BY ESTABLISHING A NEW
00:31:56 UTILITY CONNECTION WITH PGE. LAST MONTH THE S.F. MTA BOARD
00:32:00 APPROVED INSTALLING FIVE OF THESE CHARGERS IN THE DOGPATCH
00:32:03 . AND FINALLY WE HAVE VOLT POST
00:32:04 WHICH MOUNTS CHARGING HARDWARE TO EXISTING UTILITY POLES.
00:32:08 THEY ARE CONTINUING TO WORK WITH BOTH THE UTILITIES PGE
00:32:12 AND SFP. SEE TO ASSESS TECHNICAL
00:32:15 FEASIBILITY. >> I'LL FINISH BY NOTING THAT
00:32:19 THE PROGRAM CAME AT NO COST TO THE CITY.
00:32:20 THE VENDORS TAKE ON FULL RESPONSIBILITY TO OWN, INSTALL,
00:32:24 OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THESE CHARGERS.
00:32:25 WITH THAT I WILL PASS IT BACK TO DIRECTOR.
00:32:29 >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU.
00:32:32 JUST A COUPLE OF SPECIFICS. ON THE PERMIT PROGRAM WE'RE
00:32:36 WORKING TO ACHIEVE EFFICIENCIES AND BASED ON LESSONS LEARNED
00:32:40 FROM THE CHARGING PILOT. WE'RE WORKING TO CREATE A
00:32:45 LEGIBLE AND WELCOMING ENTRY POINT FOR OPERATORS PROVIDE
00:32:50 CLEAR REQUIREMENTS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT.
00:32:51 AGAIN, OF COURSE BUILDING ON OUR LESSONS LEARNED.
00:32:55 REALLY IMPORTANT FOR US TO CONTINUE THE CROSS-AGENCY
00:32:59 COLLABORATION. THIS IS WHILE WELL MTA IS THE
00:33:02 LEAD AGENCY HERE THERE ARE OTHER CITY AGENCIES THAT MAY BE
00:33:07 ISSUING PERMITS TO DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY USED SO
00:33:11 HELPFUL TO MAINTAIN A SUPPORTIVE STRUCTURE THROUGHOUT
00:33:15 THE PERMITTING PROCESS. AND THEN WE'RE LOOKING TO
00:33:19 ACHIEVE EFFICIENCIES WHEREVER POSSIBLE THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS
00:33:22 BECAUSE IT WILL REMAIN COMPLEX IF APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF
00:33:26 SUPERVISORS. THE MTA WILL ISSUE THE SITE
00:33:29 PERMIT. MTA WILL ALSO ASSESS THE SITE
00:33:33 ACCESSIBILITY DESIGNATION OF THE EV CHARGING STALLS HAS BEEN
00:33:37 DELEGATED TO THE SFM TO DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION
00:33:41 AND THAT WILL ALSO HELP SPEED UP THE PROCESS AND REMOVE SOME
00:33:46 OF THE FRICTION IN TERMS OF ADDRESSING THE COMPLEXITY WITH
00:33:49 SITE SELECTION WE'RE WORKING ON AN INTERACTIVE MAPPING TOOL TO
00:33:53 PROVIDE BLOCK LEVEL INFORMATION REGARDING POTENTIAL EV CHARGING
00:34:00 SITES. SO WE'RE DEVELOPING A
00:34:01 COMPETITIVE APPLICATION PROCESS AGAIN IF APPROVED.
00:34:05 AND THEN MTA WILL APPROVE AND PERMIT BOTH QUALIFIED
00:34:09 OPERATOR AND THE SITES AND ONCE APPROVED SUCCESSFUL OPERATORS
00:34:13 WILL STILL NEED TO OBTAIN OTHER SITE SPECIFIC PERMITS AS NEEDED
00:34:20 . HENCE OUR SUPPORTIVE PROCESS
00:34:24 AND COLLABORATIVE PROCESS WITH OUR PARTNER AGENCIES.
00:34:28 WE TALKED ABOUT COMMUNITY OUTREACH WHICH IS VERY
00:34:29 IMPORTANT. AND THEN THE OPERATOR IS
00:34:32 RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING AND ESTABLISHING THE SERVICE
00:34:35 CONNECTION AND RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE COSTS.
00:34:40 >> HERE'S AN IMAGE SHOWING THE MAPPING TOOL.
00:34:44 THIS IS JUST INTENDED AS ILLUSTRATIVE BUT AGAIN INTENDED
00:34:48 TO PROVIDE BLOCK LEVEL INFORMATION.
00:34:52 YOU CAN SEE THE GREEN AREAS ON THE MAPS WOULD BE AREAS THAT
00:34:56 WOULD BE FEASIBLE. THE RED NOT FEASIBLE AND THEN
00:35:00 WE HAVE SOME YELLOW WHICH REQUIRE A LITTLE BIT MORE
00:35:04 REVIEW. >> ARE KEY MILESTONES
00:35:07 AND TIMELINE. WE INTRODUCED THE LEGISLATION
00:35:11 ON MARCH 10TH WHERE HERE SORRY THE MTA BOARD APPROVED THE
00:35:16 PERMIT PROGRAM LAST WEEK ALTHOUGH IT'S EFFECTIVE ONLY
00:35:21 PENDING BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVAL.
00:35:25 WE'RE HERE BEFORE YOU TODAY ASKING YOUR APPROVAL FOR THE
00:35:29 ORDINANCE. AND THEN THERE AGAIN ARE
00:35:33 SUBSEQUENT MEETINGS TO FOLLOW. WE WHILE THERE HAS BEEN AN
00:35:37 AMENDMENT THAT IS INTENDED TO BE INTRODUCED, WE ARE HOPING
00:35:41 THAT WE CAN STILL MAINTAIN THE SCHEDULE AS WE ARE VERY KEEN ON
00:35:45 STAYING ON TRACK AND LAUNCHING THE COMPETITIVE APPLICATION
00:35:49 PROCESS THIS SUMMER. >> THIS IS A BIG PICTURE
00:35:53 SCHEMATIC OF THE TIMELINE. I'M NOT GOING TO GET INTO ALL
00:35:57 THE DETAILS BUT HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS HERE.
00:36:00 BUT IT'S INTENDED TO SHOW THAT EVEN AFTER THE PERMIT
00:36:04 APPLICATION LAUNCHED THERE ARE MULTIPLE AND CRITICAL KEY STEPS
00:36:08 TOWARD IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED.
00:36:15 >> AND I'LL GET INTO THE PROPOSED TECHNICAL AMENDMENT IF
00:36:20 IF WE'RE AT A GOOD POINT FOR THAT.
00:36:24 >> SO SUBSEQUENT TO THE ORDINANCE BEING SUBMITTED
00:36:28 AND INTRODUCED, THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE HAS PROPOSED
00:36:31 A TECHNICAL AMENDMENT THAT WOULD CLARIFY THE MTA'S
00:36:32 AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES FOR
00:36:36 VIOLATION OF THE PERMIT TERMS AND THEN FOR INSTALLATION OR
00:36:44 OPERATION OF AN UNPERMITTED ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING
00:36:47 STATION. AND AS I UNDERSTAND IT FROM
00:36:51 CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE THESE CLARIFICATIONS ARE CONSISTENT
00:36:55 WITH OUR CURRENT PRACTICE ON SIMILAR LEGISLATION.
00:36:58 >> AND THE LANGUAGE FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT FROM CITY
00:37:03 ATTORNEY IS ON PAGE SIX AND IN THE ORDINANCE IN THE REVISED
00:37:06 ORDINANCE. AND THE LANGUAGE IS HERE AS
00:37:09 FOLLOWS. AND VERY SPECIFIC TO THE
00:37:13 PENALTY. SO IN ADDITION TO ANY PENALTY
00:37:17 ESTABLISHED BY THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE RELATED TO PARKING
00:37:20 THE MTA MAY IMPOSE ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES IN THE
00:37:24 TRANSPORTATION CODE SO THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE BEFORE YOU TODAY.
00:37:31 WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND THERE MAY BE
00:37:32 OTHER AMENDMENTS. >> I UNDERSTAND.
00:37:36 OKAY. SUPERVISOR CHEN THANK YOU CHAIR
00:37:39 MALKA. I'M PLEASED TO SEE THE
00:37:43 LEGISLATION COMING BEFORE THIS COMMITTEE THAT IS EVENTS SAN
00:37:46 FRANCISCO'S LOCAL CLIMATE EQUITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS.
00:37:50 LAST WEEK WE EVENTS DID THE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN AND NOW WE
00:37:54 HAVE THE CURBSIDE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING PROGRAM.
00:37:58 THIS LEGISLATION IT'S A CRUCIAL PART OF OUR STRATEGY IF WE ARE
00:38:02 ABLE TO ACHIEVE OUR GOAL OF HAVING 25% OF ALL REGISTERED
00:38:06 PRIVATE VEHICLES ELECTRICS BY 2030 AND 100% BY 2040.
00:38:13 I'M PLEASED TO SEE THE FOCUS ON STRATEGIES TO SERVE RESIDENTS
00:38:17 IN MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS WITHOUT GARAGE ACCESS.
00:38:21 THIS IS A CRITICAL NEED FOR RESIDENTS WHO CANNOT CHARGE AT
00:38:25 THEIR RESIDENCE. >> I HOPE THAT THIS LEGISLATION
00:38:28 WILL FACILITATE THE PERMITTING AND INSPIRATION OF CURBSIDE
00:38:32 CHARGING IN AREAS OF THE CITY THAT ARE CURRENTLY POORLY
00:38:34 SERVED BY PUBLIC EV CHARGERS. AND I KNOW THAT MY OWN DISTRICT
00:38:39 IS ONE EXAMPLE OF THOSE. SO I WANT TO THANK YOU ALL
00:38:44 AND I WANT TO THANK SUPERVISOR MANAGEMENT AND ALSO TO AS A
00:38:45 FIRM TO FOR ALL YOUR WORK TO MOVE THIS LEGISLATION FORWARD.
00:38:49 >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU SUPERVISOR.
00:38:52 AND I HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.
00:38:55 SO GOING BACK TO YOUR PRESENTATION YOU HAD A MAP OF
00:38:59 WHERE THINGS ARE FEASIBLE OR NOT FEASIBLE AND SO CAN YOU
00:39:02 JUST EXPLAIN WHAT THE METHODOLOGY WAS FOR FIGURING
00:39:07 OUT WHAT WHAT THE DIFFERENT COLORS?
00:39:11 YES, ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION.
00:39:14 >> AND I WILL SAY THIS IS CONFIGURABLE SO THIS IS
00:39:15 INTENDED TO SHOW AT A HIGH LEVEL THE SUPPORT WE'RE
00:39:18 PROVIDING. >> BUT FOR BECAUSE AS VICE
00:39:25 CHAIR CHEN MENTIONED, WE'RE TARGETING THE RESIDENTIAL
00:39:30 NEIGHBORHOODS. RIGHT.
00:39:30 THAT WE'RE INTENDING TO PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION TO INTERESTED
00:39:34 PARTIES. >> AND THE CHARGERS ARE LEVEL
00:39:38 TO THEIR SLOWER CHARGERS THAN THE LEVEL THREE AND THEY MAKE
00:39:41 MORE SENSE IN A RESIDENTIAL CONTEXT.
00:39:45 AND SO THERE ARE CERTAIN AREAS THAT WHICH WE HAVE DESIGNATED
00:39:48 IN THE RED AS NOT FEASIBLE. AND THAT IS INTENDED TO BE
00:39:53 BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THIS CHARGING PROGRAM.
00:39:57 >> SO THERE WOULD NOT BE CHARGERS INSTALLED IN DAYLIGHT
00:40:00 ZONES FOR EXAMPLE. THAT WOULD NOT BE FEASIBLE.
00:40:04 I THINK THAT'S CLEAR MUNI STOPS VERY CLEAR.
00:40:07 RIGHT. SO WE LOOKED AT A NUMBER OF
00:40:08 DIFFERENT MAPPING LAYERS TO MAKE SURE THAT AGAIN AS WE WENT
00:40:12 IN ONCE WE PUBLISHED THIS WE HAVE NOT PUBLISHED IT YET BUT
00:40:16 THAT WE'RE GUIDING THE APPLICANTS AND INTERESTED
00:40:20 PARTIES TO THE RIGHT AREAS. BUT COLOR CURB AREAS IS ANOTHER
00:40:24 NOT FEASIBLE. BIKE LANES NARROW SIDEWALKS
00:40:28 FUTURE SEPARATE ADDED BIKE WAYS SO THOSE ARE AGAIN SOME AREAS
00:40:32 INTENDED THEY HAVE OTHER USES AND IT WOULDN'T MAKE SENSE TO
00:40:36 HAVE THE USE OF AN EV CURBSIDE EV CHARGER SO THAT'S THE
00:40:40 INTENTION WITH THE READ VERSUS THE GREEN.
00:40:43 >> OKAY. THANK YOU.
00:40:46 >> ANOTHER QUESTION I HAD WAS OF THE THREE VENDORS THAT WE
00:40:50 ARE CURRENTLY WORKING WITH FOR THE PILOT PROGRAM.
00:40:56 ONE OF THEM IS WORKING WITH A PUC AS OPPOSED TO PGD WHICH I
00:41:01 THINK IS REALLY EXCELLENT. >> AND I'M WONDERING HOW THAT
00:41:04 WILL BE ASSESSED IN TERMS OF THE SUCCESS OF, YOU KNOW, ONE
00:41:08 VENDOR OF OVER ANOTHER. >> OKAY.
00:41:11 THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION AND I MAY BRING MY COLLEAGUE
00:41:15 BRODERICK TO ANSWER. HE IS THE LEAD ON THE PILOT.
00:41:16 BUT I WILL SAY AT A HIGH LEVEL AND I THINK IT IS VERY OBVIOUS
00:41:20 AS WE ALL KNOW BUT I JUST WANT TO STATED THAT ACCESS TO THE
00:41:24 GRID IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF THIS.
00:41:27 AND WHILE MTA CAN CREATE THE WELCOMING FRONT DOOR IN THE
00:41:31 PERMIT PROGRAM WE'RE RELIANT ON ALL OF OUR SISTER AGENCIES
00:41:34 AND THE GRID FOR ACCESS AND THERE ARE MULTIPLE WAYS
00:41:36 IN SAN FRANCISCO TO ACCESS THE GRID.
00:41:40 >> AND PART OF HOW WE'RE THINKING BIG PICTURE ON A HOW
00:41:44 TO BEST SET UP THE PROGRAM FOR SUCCESS IS BUILDING IN THOSE
00:41:47 LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PILOT .
00:41:50 AND I WOULD SAY THERE ARE A COUPLE OF KEY LESSONS LEARNED
00:41:54 AND THAT IS AND KEY LESSONS THAT WE'RE LEARNING THROUGH OUR
00:41:59 CONVERSATIONS WITH OUR COLLEAGUES AT PW C ONE IS
00:42:02 AND I'M GOING TO I'M GOING TO ASK MY COLLEAGUE BRODERICK TO
00:42:06 SAY IF I DON'T SAY ANY OF THIS RIGHT, I'M GOING TO ASK HIM TO
00:42:09 CORRECT ME. BUT WHAT WE UNDERSTAND IS THAT
00:42:10 IF YOU'RE USING AN EXISTING POWER SOURCE THAT'S GOING TO GO
00:42:14 A WHOLE LOT FASTER. RIGHT.
00:42:18 IF YOU'RE EXISTING A BUILDING, A FRONTING BUILDING THAT THAT
00:42:21 ALREADY HAS CAPACITY THAT RUNNING THE CONDUIT
00:42:24 IN ESTABLISHING THAT CHARGERS GOING TO GO MORE QUICKLY.
00:42:28 >> AND THEN ALSO THE PUC CONTROLS THE GRID
00:42:32 IN REDEVELOPMENT AREAS. AND THAT'S ANOTHER KEY LESSON
00:42:37 LEARNED. AND WE ARE HOPING TO HAVE AN
00:42:41 OVERLAY ON OUR MAPPING TOOL SO WE CAN MAKE SURE VENDORS
00:42:44 APPLICANTS UNDERSTAND YOU KNOW ,HOW HOW WILL IT BE MOST
00:42:48 EFFICIENT FOR ME TO RUN MY BUSINESS TO GET THIS CHARGER
00:42:52 INSTALLED? SO WE'RE WORKING WITH P C WE'VE
00:42:56 STARTED TALKING ABOUT SOME TECHNICAL RESOURCE DOCUMENTS.
00:42:59 >> SO IF I COULD JUST PARAPHRASE A LITTLE BIT OF WHAT
00:43:01 YOU'RE SAYING. SO THE THE TIME FACTOR BECAUSE
00:43:04 WE CONTROLLED THE GRID VERSUS PERHAPS, YOU KNOW, AN OUTSIDE
00:43:08 COMPANY MIGHT BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT AT WHEN YOU ARE
00:43:12 ASSESSING LIKE THE LENGTH OF TIME THAT IT TAKES TO GET THE
00:43:16 PERMITS AND ALL OF THAT. >> THAT'S CORRECT.
00:43:19 >> AND THEN ALSO THE POLE MOUNTED TECHNOLOGY BRODRICK
00:43:23 MENTIONED THAT VOLT POST IS HAS PROPOSED THIS POLE MOUNTED
00:43:26 TECHNOLOGY AND THAT'S A LITTLE BIT OF A NEWER TYPE OF BUSINESS
00:43:31 MODEL FOR US. AND THERE HAVE BEEN A LOT OF
00:43:35 LESSONS LEARNED UNDER THE PILOT .
00:43:38 AND SO WHILE IT'S BEEN THERE HAVE BEEN CHALLENGES WITH THAT
00:43:41 PROPOSED TECHNOLOGY. >> IT LOOKS LIKE WE ARE WORKING
00:43:43 TO CREATE A PATH FORWARD WITH PGD.
00:43:46 SOUNDS LIKE PGD HAS, YOU KNOW, A PLAN FOR THAT.
00:43:51 SO THERE'S A WHOLE LOT TO IT. >> IT'S VERY TECHNICAL
00:43:57 AND WE'RE LEARNING AS WE GO IN BUILDING ON THE KNOWLEDGE
00:44:01 IN THE PILOT. DOES THAT HELP?
00:44:02 THANK YOU. >> OKAY.
00:44:05 I DON'T SEE ANYONE ELSE ON THE ROSTER.
00:44:09 WE HAVE SOMEONE HERE FROM SUPERVISOR FOR PRESIDENT
00:44:13 MENDELSOHN'S OFFICE WHO IS A SPONSOR OF THIS LEGISLATION.
00:44:16 >> HI. WELCOME.
00:44:19 HELLO. >> RENE AUBERJONOIS, A
00:44:20 LEGISLATIVE AIDE FOR PRESIDENT MAILMAN HERE OUR OFFICE IS
00:44:24 PROPOSING IN ADDITION TO THE AMENDMENT THE MTA ALREADY SPOKE
00:44:28 ABOUT OUR OFFICE IS PROPOSING AN ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT TO THIS
00:44:32 LEGISLATION WHICH HAS ALREADY BEEN CIRCULATED WITH YOU ALL AS
00:44:35 FOLLOWS ON PAGE THREE, LINE 19 WE WOULD LIKE TO ADD SECTION F
00:44:39 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS URGES THE MTA TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT
00:44:44 THE CURBSIDE EV CHARGING PROGRAM TO DISCOURAGE
00:44:46 COMMERCIAL FLEET VEHICLE CHARGING AND MAXIMIZE CHARGING
00:44:48 STATION ACCESS TO PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS IN ORDER TO MEET
00:44:51 THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT OF PROVIDING ELECTRIC VEHICLE
00:44:55 CHARGING OPPORTUNITIES FOR RESIDENTS WHO DO NOT HAVE
00:44:56 ACCESS TO OFF STREET GARAGES WITHIN THEIR HOMES.
00:45:00 >> SO THE INTENT HERE IS PRETTY SIMPLE.
00:45:03 WE BELIEVE IT IMPORTANT THAT THE BENEFITS OF THESE ADDED
00:45:06 CURBSIDE CHARGERS THROUGH THIS NEW PERMITTING PROCESS FLOW
00:45:10 DIRECTLY TO THE SAN FRANCISCANS WHO NEED THEM MOST.
00:45:14 SO THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO OWN EVS BUT RENT OR LIVE
00:45:18 IN APARTMENT BUILDINGS OR MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS AND ALL
00:45:19 TOO OFTEN HAVE NO ACCESS TO CHARGERS WITHIN THEIR HOME.
00:45:23 THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO FOR REASONS OF CLIMATE OR
00:45:27 AFFORDABILITY WOULD LIKE TO PURCHASE AN EV BUT THEY CAN'T
00:45:30 MAKE IT WORK BECAUSE OF OUR CITY'S CURRENTLY EXISTING
00:45:31 LIMITED CURBSIDE CAPACITY. >> AND THESE ARE THE SAME
00:45:34 PEOPLE WHO FOR YEARS AND YEARS NOW HAVE BEEN ASKING THE CITY
00:45:38 TO EXPAND CURBSIDE CHARGING FIRST THROUGH THE PILOT AND NOW
00:45:43 THROUGH THIS LEGISLATION. SO THIS AMENDMENT RECOGNIZES
00:45:46 THAT FACT THAT TRUTH AND URGES THE MTA TO ENSURE THAT CURBSIDE
00:45:50 CHARGERS BENEFIT THE PEOPLE DIRECTLY INSTEAD OF BEING
00:45:54 CO-OPTED FOR COMMERCIAL FLEET PURPOSES.
00:45:57 SO WITH THAT PENDING YOUR QUESTIONS I RESPECTFULLY ASK
00:45:58 YOU TO ADOPT THIS AMENDMENT. >> THANK YOU.
00:46:01 THANK YOU, MR. RAJOY. WITH THAT LET'S GO TO PUBLIC
00:46:05 COMMENT ON THIS ITEM PLEASE, MR. CLERK.
00:46:06 >> THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION
00:46:08 WILL NOW HEAR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
00:46:11 TWO. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CURBSIDE
00:46:12 CHARGING IF YOU HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THIS ITEM PLEASE
00:46:15 LINE UP TO SPEAK ALONG THAT WALL AND YOU CAN COME FORWARD
00:46:16 TO THE LECTERN. >> AFTERNOON AGAIN SUPERVISORS
00:46:19 MARK GLEASON TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL SEVEN AND OUR AFFILIATE
00:46:24 LOCALS WE ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE CURBSIDE PROGRAM.
00:46:30 IT'S GOING TO BE A GREAT BENEFIT FOR RESIDENTS
00:46:32 AND WORKING PEOPLE IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO HAVEN'T HAD
00:46:34 ACCESS TO BEING ABLE TO POWER THEIR EVS.
00:46:37 BUT WE ALSO ARE VERY APPRECIATIVE OF THE AMENDMENT
00:46:41 THAT PRESIDENT MANAGEMENT IS PUTTING FORWARD.
00:46:42 IT ADDRESSES THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE ABOUT THE CONDITIONS
00:46:50 AND INDEED THE PRACTICES OF LARGE GLOBAL COMMERCIAL
00:46:54 COMPANIES TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF SOME ASPECTS OF THE
00:46:58 INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WE HAVE IN SAN FRANCISCO.
00:47:02 BUT AGAIN WE ARE VERY SUPPORTIVE OF THIS CURBSIDE
00:47:06 PROGRAM POST PILOT WE ARE SUPPORTIVE OF IT DURING THAT
00:47:11 TIME AS WELL AND WE HOPE THAT YOU LOOK WELL ON PRESIDENT
00:47:14 MANHATTAN'S AMENDMENT AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH
00:47:18 EVERYONE GOING FORWARD ON THIS VERY WONDERFUL PROJECT THAT'S
00:47:21 GOING TO BENEFIT RESIDENTS AND WORKERS IN SAN FRANCISCO.
00:47:23 THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
00:47:26 DO WE HAVE ANYONE ELSE WHO HAS PUBLIC COMMENT FOR AGENDA ITEM
00:47:29 NUMBER TWO MADAM CHAIR OKAY PEOPLE COMMENT ON THIS ITEM IS
00:47:33 NOW CLOSED. MR. CLERK I'D LIKE TO MAKE A
00:47:37 MOTION THAT WE AMEND THIS LEGISLATION AS READ INTO THE
00:47:41 RECORD BY MR. RAJOY AND THEN SEND IT OUT WITH A POSITIVE
00:47:46 RECOMMENDATION AND TO THE FULL BOARD.
00:47:50 >> MADAM CHAIR, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION THERE I BELIEVE
00:47:53 WERE TWO DIFFERENT AMENDMENTS ONE THAT WAS PROPOSED BY MTA
00:47:57 AND ONE THAT WAS PROPOSED BY BY SUPERVISOR MAITLAND'S OFFICE.
00:47:58 I SEE DOING JUST ONE OF THOSE TWO PORTIONS.
00:48:02 >> I STAND CORRECTED AT LET'S DO BOTH OF THEM AND THEN SEND
00:48:05 IT OUT AS AMENDED. >> I'M SORRY, GO AHEAD.
00:48:09 DEPUTY DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY BRAD RESCUE THE AMENDMENTS THAT
00:48:13 WE REQUESTED UNDER THE MTA ADD TO THE LEGISLATION ARE
00:48:16 SUBSTANTIVE AND SO WE'LL NEED TO CONTINUE THIS TO NEXT WEEK
00:48:20 BUT TO MEET THEIR SCHEDULE OF COURSE YOU COULD AGENDA AS OF
00:48:24 NEXT WEEK AS A COMMITTEE REPORT FOR THE NEXT DAY'S MEETING.
00:48:27 >> THANK YOU. LET ME AMEND MY MOTION TO AMEND
00:48:31 THIS LEGISLATION AS READ INTO THE RECORD BY BOTH THE MTA
00:48:38 AND MR. RAJOY AND THEN WE CONTINUE IT TO THE MEETING OF
00:48:42 APRIL 20TH TWO MOTIONS ONE OF THEM TO ACCEPT BOTH SETS OF
00:48:49 AMENDMENTS AND THEN A SECOND MOTION TO CONTINUE AS AMENDED
00:48:55 TO APRIL 20TH EACH OF THOSE MOTIONS OFFERED BY CHAIR
00:48:57 MELGAR. ON THOSE MOTIONS VICE CHAIR
00:48:59 CHIN CHIN I AM MAHMOOD MAHMOOD I CHAIR MELGAR I MELGAR I
00:49:03 AND I'M SURE THERE ARE THREE EYES THANK YOU.
00:49:07 THAT MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU ALL.
00:49:10 >> LET'S GO TO ITEM NUMBER THREE PLEASE.
00:49:11 MR. CLERK. >> AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE IS
00:49:17 AN ORDINANCE TEMPORARILY EXCLUDING CERTAIN SITES FROM
00:49:21 THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL NUMBER 79 SB 79
00:49:23 THAT REQUIRE LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO ALLOW
00:49:27 RESIDENTIAL USES AT VARIOUS DENSITIES HEIGHTS AND FLOOR
00:49:29 AREA RATIOS ON SITES WITHIN ONE HALF MILE OF A TRANSIT ORIENTED
00:49:35 DEVELOPMENT STOP. SECOND PERMANENTLY EXCLUDING
00:49:39 FROM THOSE PROVISIONS OF SB 79 SITES LOCATED IN INDUSTRIAL
00:49:40 EMPLOYMENT HUBS INCLUDING CERTAIN SITES ZONED M.
00:49:47 S L I PDR WMU G AND P AND SITES WITH A WALKING PATH OF MORE
00:49:55 THAN ONE MILE TO THE CLOSEST TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT STOP.
00:49:58 THIRD AMENDING THE PLANNING CODE TO PERMIT ADDITIONAL
00:50:02 DENSITY AND HEIGHT FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS ON CERTAIN
00:50:05 PARCELS WITHIN ONE HALF MILE OF A TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT.
00:50:07 STOP. FOURTH ADOPTING AN ALTERNATIVE
00:50:11 PLAN TO SB 79 INCLUDING MAKING FINDINGS THAT THE ALTERNATE
00:50:13 PLAN PROVIDES EQUIVALENT DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY.
00:50:18 FIFTH MAKING FINDINGS THAT THESE EXEMPTIONS AND THE CITY'S
00:50:20 RESIDENTIAL CAPACITY MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SB 79 AND SIX
00:50:26 DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO
00:50:28 TRANSMIT A COPY OF THE ORDINANCE TO THE CALIFORNIA
00:50:30 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
00:50:31 THE ORDINANCE ALSO AFFIRMS THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECRET
00:50:34 DETERMINATION AND MAKES OTHER FINDINGS.
00:50:35 MADAM CHAIR. THANK YOU, MR. CLERK.
00:50:40 WELCOME. WE HAVE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
00:50:45 SARAH RICHARDSON AND JOSH SAWICKI HERE TO PRESENT AS WELL
00:50:49 AS MR. HOCHSTEIN. >> GO AHEAD.
00:50:53 THANK YOU. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR CHAIR
00:50:56 MELGAR AND SUPERVISORS MAHMUD AND CHEN.
00:50:57 I'M SARAH RICHARDSON, PLANNING STAFF.
00:51:01 THANK YOU FOR HAVING US TODAY TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF THE
00:51:04 PROPOSED TRANSIT ORIENTED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
00:51:06 ORDINANCE. SAN FRANCISCO'S PLAN FOR
00:51:09 IMPLEMENTING CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE BILL 79 THIS LEGISLATION
00:51:12 WAS INTRODUCED BY MAYOR DANIEL LURIE ON FEBRUARY 10TH AND WAS
00:51:16 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL ALL WITH MODIFICATIONS BY THE
00:51:20 PLANNING COMMISSION ON MARCH 19TH.
00:51:23 IT IS BOARD FILE NUMBER 260132. WE HAVE BEEN BEFORE YOU TO
00:51:28 DISCUSS SB 79 AND THE CONTEXT OF THE FAMILY ZONING PLAN BUT
00:51:31 IN TODAY'S PRESENTATION I WILL STILL PROVIDE YOU WITH SOME
00:51:35 BACKGROUND ON SB 79. THEN I WILL GIVE A BRIEF
00:51:38 OVERVIEW OF THE ORDINANCE AND FINALLY I'LL WALK THROUGH
00:51:41 THE KEY COMPONENTS OF THE ORDINANCE IN MORE DETAIL.
00:51:47 >> SB 79 THE ABUNDANT AND AFFORDABLE HOMES NEAR
00:51:52 TRANSIT ACT WAS PASSED LAST YEAR BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE
00:51:56 AND TAKES EFFECT ON JULY 1ST TO CREATE MORE CAPACITY FOR
00:51:59 HOUSING NEAR TRANSIT. IT SETS MINIMUM HEIGHT
00:52:03 AND DENSITY LIMITS WITHIN 200FT ONE QUARTER MILE AND ONE HALF
00:52:08 MILE OF BOTH EXISTING AND PLANNED TRANSIT STOPS
00:52:12 CREATING CONCENTRIC CIRCLES AROUND EACH QUALIFYING STOP.
00:52:15 NOTE THAT A FEW OF THE PLAN STOPS SHOWN ON THIS
00:52:17 AND SUBSEQUENT SUBSEQUENT MAPS INCLUDING THE POTENTIAL OAKDALE
00:52:23 CALTRAIN STATION AND BRT STOPS ON GENEVA AVENUE AS WELL AS OF
00:52:28 A HANDFUL A SMALL HANDFUL OF EXISTING BUS STOPS WERE
00:52:32 PREVIOUSLY ASSUMED TO BE SUBJECT TO SB 79 BUT ARE NOW
00:52:35 UNLIKELY TO BE INCLUDED BASED ON UPDATED DRAFT GUIDANCE
00:52:38 AND MAPS PUBLISHED BY MTC WITHIN THE PAST FEW DAYS.
00:52:42 >> BACK TO THE BASICS AND THERE ARE TWO TIERS OF STOPS.
00:52:48 TIER ONE WHICH ALLOWS FOR SLIGHTLY TALLER AND DENSER
00:52:52 HOUSING INCLUDES BART AND CALTRAIN STOPS.
00:52:55 AND TIER TWO INCLUDES MUNI METRO AND MAJOR BUS STOPS.
00:52:56 SUCH AS BUS RAPID TRANSIT. MORE THAN THREE QUARTERS OF
00:53:02 PROPERTIES IN SAN FRANCISCO THAT'S 120,000 OR SO PARCELS
00:53:05 FALL WITHIN AREAS SUBJECT TO SB 79.
00:53:08 SB 79 ALLOWS FOR CITIES TO EXEMPT PARCELS THAT MEET
00:53:13 CERTAIN CRITERIA FROM THESE REQUIREMENTS.
00:53:16 SOME OF THESE EXEMPTIONS ARE TEMPORARY AND OTHERS ARE
00:53:19 PERMANENT. AND FINALLY SB 79 ALSO ALLOWS
00:53:22 FOR JURISDICTIONS TO ADOPT AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN IN PLACE OF
00:53:25 IMPLEMENTING THE DEFAULT HEIGHTS AND DENSITIES REQUIRED
00:53:27 UNDER SB 79. >> HERE ARE THE DEFAULT
00:53:35 DENSITIES AND HEIGHTS UNDER SB 79 OVERLAID ON THE CITY
00:53:39 IN RESPECTIVE OF OUR EXISTING ZONING.
00:53:40 ON THE LEFT YOU CAN SEE THAT THE DENSITIES RANGE FROM 160
00:53:43 UNITS PER ACRE WITHIN 200FT OF TIER ONE STOPS TO 80 UNITS PER
00:53:50 ACRE FOR PARCELS THAT ARE BETWEEN ONE QUARTER MILE
00:53:53 AND ONE HALF MILE FROM TIER TWO STOPS.
00:53:56 ON THE RIGHT YOU CAN SEE THE HEIGHTS WHICH RANGE FROM NINE
00:54:00 STORIES ADJACENT TO THE STOPS TO FIVE STORIES FURTHER FROM
00:54:01 THE STOPS. >> NOW THIS MAP COMPARES THE SB
00:54:09 79 HEIGHTS WITH OUR EXISTING HEIGHT LIMITS AND DENOTES THOSE
00:54:10 DIFFERENCES WITH COLOR. SAN FRANCISCO HAS HIGHER HEIGHT
00:54:14 LIMITS DOWNTOWN AND ALONG COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS WHICH YOU
00:54:18 CAN SEE IN THE GREENS AND BLUES.
00:54:20 WHILE SB 79 HEIGHT LIMITS ARE HIGHER OFF CORRIDORS
00:54:22 AND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS WHICH YOU CAN SEE IN THE ORANGE
00:54:26 AND YELLOW, THIS MAP ALSO SHOWS THE OUTLINE OF THE RECENTLY
00:54:29 PASSED FAMILY ZONING PLAN AREA AND YOU CAN SEE HOW ALONG
00:54:34 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS ARE EXISTING HEIGHTS
00:54:37 ARE 1 TO 4 STORIES TALLER THAN WHAT WOULD BE ALLOWED UNDER SB
00:54:42 79 SUCH AS ALONG IRVING STREET IN THE SUNSET.
00:54:43 WHEREAS IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREA SURROUNDING IT OUR EXISTING
00:54:47 HEIGHTS ARE 1 TO 2 STORIES LOWER.
00:54:49 THIS MEANS THAT UNDER THE DEFAULT SB 79 HEIGHTS THE AREAS
00:54:53 IN ORANGE AND YELLOW WOULD INCREASE IN HEIGHT.
00:54:56 I SHOULD NOTE THAT IN MANY PLACES SB 79 DOES NOT
00:55:00 NECESSARILY ALLOW MORE UNITS OR MORE DEVELOP A FLOOR AREA ON
00:55:04 THESE PARCELS THAN OUR ZONING ALLOWS.
00:55:07 IT SOMETIMES JUST ALLOWS MORE HEIGHT.
00:55:11 NOW TO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU IT HAS FOUR PRIMARY
00:55:15 PARTS. >> IT PERMANENTLY EXCLUDES
00:55:19 THREE INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT HUBS FROM BEING SUBJECT TO SB
00:55:22 79. IT TEMPORARILY EXEMPTS LOW
00:55:23 RESOURCE SOME LOW RESOURCE CENSUS TRACTS.
00:55:27 IT AMENDS THE PLANNING CODE TO ADD A NEW DENSITY AND HEIGHT
00:55:31 EXCEPTION TO ARTICLE TWO. AND FINALLY IT ADOPTS AN
00:55:34 ALTERNATIVE PLAN UNDER SB 79 INCLUDING DEMONSTRATING THE
00:55:38 HOUSING CAPACITY TO QUALIFY. NOW I WILL DISCUSS EACH OF
00:55:42 THESE COMPONENTS IN A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
00:55:48 >> SB 79 ALLOWS THE PERMANENT EXCLUSION OF PARCELS THAT MEET
00:55:54 CERTAIN CONDITIONS. THE FIRST IS IF THE PARCEL IS
00:55:57 IN AN INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT HUB.
00:55:58 THESE HUBS MUST BE ZONED AND IDENTIFIED IN OUR GENERAL
00:56:02 PLAN TO BE FOR INDUSTRIAL AND EMPLOYMENT USES NOT
00:56:05 GENERALLY PERMIT HOUSING BE CONTIGUOUS AND BE OVER 250
00:56:10 ACRES. THERE ARE THREE OF THESE IN SAN
00:56:13 FRANCISCO AS SHOWN IN SHADED PINK ON THIS MAP.
00:56:17 IN THE SOUTH OF MARKET IN MISSION BAYSHORE AND CENTRAL
00:56:18 WATERFRONT AND BAYVIEW NEIGHBORHOODS COLLECTIVELY THE
00:56:22 INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT HUBS CONSIST OF JUST BELOW 2000
00:56:26 PARCELS. THESE PARCELS WILL NOT BE
00:56:30 SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SB 79 AND THIS REFLECTS EXISTING
00:56:32 ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN POLICIES AND HELPS TO PRESERVE
00:56:36 THE TYPES OF BUSINESSES AND CORE CITY FUNCTIONS THAT
00:56:40 OPERATE THERE AND THAT OPERATE THERE.
00:56:41 >> THE JOBS THEY SUPPORT AND THE ECONOMIC DIVERSITY THEY
00:56:44 BRING TO THE CITY. THE SECOND CONDITION THAT
00:56:47 QUALIFIES FOR A PERMANENT EXCLUSION IS IF PARCELS ARE
00:56:51 MORE THAN A MILE WALK FROM A QUALIFYING TRANSIT STOP.
00:56:55 >> BUT THAT DOES NOT APPLY IN SAN FRANCISCO.
00:56:57 AN EXCLUSION MEANS THAT THE PARCELS THERE DO NOT COUNT
00:57:00 IN THE BASELINE AGAINST OUR ALTERNATIVE PLAN REQUIREMENTS.
00:57:03 HOWEVER, BY MAKING THESE PERMANENT EXCLUSIONS FROM SB 79
00:57:07 IT DOES NOT IN ANY WAY PERMANENTLY FREEZE ZONING
00:57:11 AND LAND USE POLICY IN THESE AREAS AND SAYS NOTHING ABOUT
00:57:12 THE FUTURE LOCAL LAND USE DECISIONS OR ZONING IN THESE
00:57:16 AREAS INCLUDING RELATED TO HOUSING AND OTHER USES.
00:57:25 >> SB 79 ALSO ALLOWS FOR A FEW TEMPORARY EXEMPTIONS AS LISTED
00:57:30 HERE. THE LEGISLATION BEFORE YOU
00:57:31 INCLUDES A TEMPORARY EXEMPTION FOR PARCELS IN CENSUS TRACTS
00:57:34 THAT THE CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE OR TAKAC
00:57:38 IDENTIFIED AS LOW RESOURCE BUT JUST THOSE THAT ARE IN MISSION
00:57:42 BAY AND SOUTH OF 16TH STREET. ADDITIONALLY, AS IS REFLECTED
00:57:45 IN THIS MAP, A PROPOSED AMENDMENT BEFORE YOU WOULD ALSO
00:57:49 INCLUDE THE LOW RESOURCE TRACTS THAT OVERLAP WITH THE PROPOSED
00:57:53 INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT HUB NORTH OF 16TH STREET.
00:57:56 THIS MEANS THAT THE PARCELS IN INDUSTRIAL AND EMPLOYMENT
00:58:00 HUBS THAT ARE ALSO IN LOW RESOURCE TRACTS WOULD APPEAR ON
00:58:04 BOTH EXEMPTION LISTS. >> THE LOW RESOURCE AREAS ARE
00:58:08 IN PURPLE HERE AND INCLUDE APPROXIMATELY 32,000 PARCELS.
00:58:11 THEY WILL BE TEMPORARILY EXEMPTED FROM THE FROM THE
00:58:15 PROVISIONS OF SB 79 UNTIL ONE YEAR AFTER OUR NEXT HOUSING
00:58:19 ELEMENT IS ADOPTED IN 2032. THIS GIVES THE CITY ADDITIONAL
00:58:23 TIME TO PLAN FOR INCREASED HOUSING CAPACITY IN THESE AREAS
00:58:27 AND TO CLARIFY THE RELATIONSHIP OF SB 79 TO REDEVELOPMENT AREAS
00:58:30 AND POTENTIAL TRANSIT STOPS. IT ALSO ALLOWS THE CITY TO
00:58:33 CONDUCT MORE DELIBERATE PLANNING POLICY DISCUSSIONS,
00:58:37 ENABLE COMMUNITY CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THE FUTURE OF THESE AREAS
00:58:42 AND PROVIDES ADDITIONAL TIME TO WORK WITH EACH CODE AROUND
00:58:45 CERTAIN UNCLEAR PROVISIONS OF THE LAW.
00:58:46 >> THE OTHER TEMPORARY EXEMPTIONS FOR PARCELS ALLOWED
00:58:50 IN THE LAW AREN'T NECESSARY FOR US TO INVOKE BECAUSE THE
00:58:53 ORDINANCE PURSUES AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN.
00:59:00 >> THERE ARE THREE MAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR PURSUING AN
00:59:04 ALTERNATIVE PLAN IN PLACE OF THE DEFAULT SB 79 HEIGHTS
00:59:06 AND DENSITIES. THE FIRST IS THAT THE TOTAL NET
00:59:09 CAPACITY OF EXISTING HEIGHTS AND DENSITIES IN AGGREGATE
00:59:13 ACROSS ALL OF THE ALTERNATIVE PLAN AREA WHICH IN OUR CASE IS
00:59:17 THE ENTIRE CITY IS GREATER THAN WHAT WOULD BE ALLOWED UNDER SB
00:59:20 79. THIS REQUIREMENT IS MET
00:59:21 PRIMARILY DUE TO THE RECENTLY PASSED FAMILY ZONING PLAN WHICH
00:59:25 ADDED A WHOLE LOT OF ADDITIONAL CAPACITY FOR HOUSING ON THE
00:59:28 NORTH, CENTRAL AND WESTERN SIDES OF THE CITY.
00:59:31 >> THE OTHER TWO REQUIREMENTS SAY THAT TO QUALIFY EACH PARCEL
00:59:35 WITHIN THE SB 79 GEOGRAPHY AND EACH AGGREGATE STATION AREA
00:59:39 MUST ALLOW AT LEAST 50% OF THE DENSITY ALLOWED UNDER SB 79.
00:59:42 OUR EXISTING ZONING DOESN'T QUITE MEET THOSE REQUIREMENTS.
00:59:45 THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 2000 PARCELS IN COLOR ON THIS MAP
00:59:49 IN THE EAST AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CITY THAT WOULD NEED TO
00:59:53 ALLOW ADDITIONAL DENSITY. MOST OF THE COLORED PARCELS ARE
00:59:56 ORANGE INDICATING THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO ALLOW JUST ONE
01:00:00 ADDITIONAL UNIT FROM WHAT IS ALLOWED TODAY AS THE PARCEL
01:00:04 GETS LARGER. THE INCREASE IN UNITS IS HIGHER
01:00:07 . >> THIS MAP ALSO SHOWS THE
01:00:08 TEMPORARILY EXEMPTED LOW INCOME CENSUS TRACTS IN PURPLE THE
01:00:12 PARCEL SHOWN IN LOW RESOURCE AREAS.
01:00:15 >> APPROXIMATELY HALF OF THE 2000 PARCELS WOULD NOT NEED TO
01:00:19 MEET THIS REQUIREMENT THIS DENSITY REQUIREMENT UNTIL 2032
01:00:22 BECAUSE THOSE AREAS ARE BEING EXEMPTED FROM SB 79 AND THE
01:00:26 ALTERNATIVE PLAN UNTIL THEN TO MEET THOSE LAST TWO
01:00:35 REQUIREMENTS OF A CITYWIDE ALTERNATIVE PLAN.
01:00:36 THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE INCLUDES A PLANNING CODE AMENDMENT.
01:00:40 IT ADDS A NEW DENSITY AND HEIGHT EXCEPTION TO ARTICLE
01:00:43 TWO SECTION 207 11 THAT PERMITS ADDITIONAL DENSITY AND HEIGHT
01:00:46 FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS ON PARCELS WITHIN ONE HALF MILE OF
01:00:50 A QUALIFYING TRANSIT STOP. UP TO 50% OF THE DENSITY
01:00:54 PERMITTED UNDER SB 79 AND ON THE FEW PARCELS IN THESE AREAS
01:00:58 WITH A HEIGHT LIMIT THAT'S LESS THAN 40FT IT WOULD ALLOW 40FT.
01:01:02 >> THE PARCELS MUST MEET SEVERAL CRITERIA INCLUDING BUT
01:01:06 NOT LIMITED TO THEY MUST BE IN A ZONING DISTRICT THAT
01:01:10 PRINCIPALLY PERMITS HOUSING THEN NOT WITHIN THE FAMILY
01:01:13 ZONING PLAN AREA. NOT SEEKING A DENSITY BONUS
01:01:17 AND NOT ON A PARCEL WITH A LISTED HISTORIC BUILDING
01:01:21 WHETHER IT IS INDIVIDUALLY LISTED OR LANDMARKED OR
01:01:24 CONTRIBUTORY WITH THIS PLANNING CODE AMENDMENT THE ENTIRE CITY
01:01:31 WOULD QUALIFY FOR AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN.
01:01:35 NO TAKING THIS INTO ACCOUNT WITH THE PERMANENT
01:01:43 AND TEMPORARY EXEMPTIONS, THE TOTAL HOUSING CAPACITY
01:01:46 AND DENSITY IN SAN FRANCISCO IS GREATER THAN WHAT WOULD BE
01:01:50 ALLOWED BY SB 79 BY ABOUT 170,000 NET UNITS AND 213
01:01:55 MILLION NET SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA.
01:01:59 NOTE THAT SB 79 DOES NOT ALLOW THE COUNTING OF ALL THE ZONED
01:02:02 CAPACITY IN THIS AREA AND CAPS EACH PARCEL AT TWICE WHAT SB 79
01:02:07 ALLOWS. IF ALL OF SAN FRANCISCO'S ZONED
01:02:11 CAPACITY WAS COUNTED IN THESE AREAS IT WOULD EXCEED SB 79 BY
01:02:14 ALMOST 400,000 UNITS. SO THIS MEANS THAT NO PARCEL
01:02:21 IN THE CITY WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE DEFAULT SB 79 HEIGHTS
01:02:25 AND DENSITIES A SMALL NUMBER OF PARCELS WILL BE ELIGIBLE FOR A
01:02:29 NEW DENSITY EXCEPTION FOR UP TO 50% OF THE DENSITY ALLOWED
01:02:32 UNDER SB 79 ALL OUTSIDE THE FAMILY ZONING PLAN AREA.
01:02:36 THIS WILL CREATE ANOTHER WAY FOR PROPERTIES TO BUILD 4 TO 6
01:02:42 UNITS IN RH DISTRICTS OUTSIDE THE FAMILY OR IN RH DISTRICTS
01:02:45 OUTSIDE THE FAMILY ZONING PLAN AREA.
01:02:46 THIS DOES NOT CHANGE WHAT THE UNDERLYING ZONING REQUIRES SUCH
01:02:50 AS WITH UNIT MIXES. >> IN 2032 THE TEMPORARY
01:02:56 EXEMPTION FOR LOW RESOURCE TRACTS WILL EXPIRE
01:03:00 AND ADDITIONAL PARCELS WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE 50% DENSITY
01:03:01 REQUIREMENT AND THE ALTERNATIVE PLAN NOR THE EXEMPTIONS PREVENT
01:03:07 THE CITY FROM MAKING FUTURE ZONING AND LAND USE POLICIES
01:03:09 IN THESE AREAS INCLUDING RELATED TO HOUSING.
01:03:12 THERE'S BEEN SOME MISINFORMED PUBLIC COMMENT AND ADVOCACY
01:03:15 ABOUT THIS. THIS IS STRICTLY ABOUT THE
01:03:19 APPLICATION OF SB 79 IN THE NEAR TERM BY PROVIDING THE
01:03:23 OPTIONS FOR THE ALTERNATIVE PLAN AND OTHER EXCLUSIONS IN SB
01:03:27 79. THE STATE LEGISLATURE
01:03:28 AFFIRMATIVELY RECOGNIZED THAT CERTAIN MAJOR CHANGES IN LAND
01:03:32 USE POLICY SHOULD NOT BE FORCED ON CITIES.
01:03:33 ON JULY 1ST OF THIS YEAR OR ANY TIME THEREAFTER AS A RESULT OF
01:03:39 SB 79 GENERALLY THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE PREVENTS SB 79 FROM
01:03:43 OVERWRITING LOCAL ZONING IN THE IMMEDIATE TERM AND LEAVES THE
01:03:47 CITY IN CONTROL TO UNDERTAKE WHATEVER LAND USE AND ZONING
01:03:51 DISCUSSIONS IT WANTS TO HAVE IN THE FUTURE WITH AN
01:03:54 APPROPRIATE TIMELINE AND DESIRED TERMS INCLUDING BY
01:03:55 CONDUCTING COMMUNITY PLANNING PROCESSES WITH DUE DILIGENCE.
01:04:02 >> WITHOUT THIS ORDINANCE ALL OF THE PARCELS THAT YOU SEE
01:04:07 HERE IN BLUE WOULD INCREASE IN HEIGHT LIMIT UNDER THE
01:04:10 DEFAULT SB 79 HEIGHT LIMIT. >> THOUGH I SHOULD NOTE THAT
01:04:13 WHILE SB 79 ALLOWS TALLER BUILDINGS IN THESE AREAS IT
01:04:17 DOES NOT NECESSARILY ALLOW MORE UNITS THAN OUR ZONING ALLOWS
01:04:21 IN THESE AREAS. STILL WITH THIS ORDINANCE
01:04:22 IN THE NEAR TERM THE ONLY PARCELS THAT MAY INCREASE
01:04:25 IN DENSITY GENERALLY NOT HEIGHT WILL BE THOSE IN ORANGE ON THIS
01:04:29 MAP. ON THE RIGHT.
01:04:32 >> SO AS A RECAP THE ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU PERMANENTLY EXCLUDES
01:04:39 THE THREE INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT HUBS TEMPORARILY EXEMPTS LOW
01:04:43 RESOURCE CENSUS TRACTS SOUTH OF 16TH STREET AND IN MISSION BAY
01:04:47 . AMENDS THE PLANNING CODE TO
01:04:48 ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL DENSITY UP TO 50% OF THE DENSITY ALLOWED
01:04:51 UNDER SB 79 AND ADOPTS AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN INCLUDING
01:04:54 DEMONSTRATING RESIDENTIAL CAPACITY TO QUALIFY.
01:04:58 THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH
01:05:01 MODIFICATIONS. >> THE MODIFICATION IS TO FIX A
01:05:02 TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN THE ORDINANCE AND LONG TITLE THAT
01:05:06 STATES THAT ONE OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE INDUSTRIAL
01:05:09 EMPLOYMENT HUB AREA IS WEST SOMA MIXED USE GENERAL OR WHEN
01:05:13 IT SHOULD BE WEST SOMA MIXED USE OFFICE.
01:05:19 >> ADDITIONALLY THE OTHER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS INCLUDE
01:05:20 UPDATING THE PARCEL TABLES TO ADD PARCELS THAT ARE BOTH
01:05:23 IN EXCLUDED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS AND THE LOW RESOURCE
01:05:27 CENSUS TRACTS TO THE LIST OF TEMPORARY EXCLUSIONS FOR LOW
01:05:31 RESOURCE PARCELS. CURRENTLY THOSE PARCELS ARE
01:05:34 ONLY LISTED IN THE INDUSTRIAL EXCLUSION LIST EVEN THOUGH BOTH
01:05:38 CIRCUMSTANCES APPLY. IT ALSO ANOTHER AMENDMENT IS TO
01:05:42 DUPLICATE THE FILE AND HOLD THE DUPLICATE AT LAND USE
01:05:45 AND ADDING A NOTE IN THE ORDINANCE IS FINDING SECTION OF
01:05:47 THE DUPLICATED FILE THAT THE THAT REVIEW OF THE ORDINANCE BY
01:05:50 CDD IS ONGOING. >> HERE'S A LINK TO THE
01:05:57 PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S WEB PAGE ABOUT THE LEGISLATION.
01:06:01 I SHOULD ALSO NOTE THAT THE DEPARTMENT HAS CONDUCTED PUBLIC
01:06:04 WEBINARS, MET WITH COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS
01:06:05 AND SENT NEWSLETTERS TO EXPLAIN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SB 79
01:06:09 AND THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE. IN THE PAST WEEK OR SO THE
01:06:13 DEPARTMENT HAS RECEIVED ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK INCLUDING
01:06:16 FROM NEW ORGANIZATIONS AND WE WILL BE FOLLOWING UP WITH THEM
01:06:17 BEFORE THE BOARD HEARING. THAT CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION
01:06:20 AND WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
01:06:24 >> THANK YOU MISS RICHARDSON AND I NORMALLY LET MY
01:06:27 COLLEAGUES GO FIRST BUT ON THIS ONE I'M JUST GOING TO SAY A
01:06:31 COUPLE THINGS AND THEN ASK A COUPLE QUESTIONS BEFORE I TURN
01:06:34 IT OVER TO SUPERVISOR MAHMUD. SO IF YOU COULD COME BACK MISS
01:06:39 RICHARDSON OR I DON'T KNOW WHO'S GOING TO ANSWER QUESTIONS
01:06:45 . IN THE LAST WEEK I'VE HEARD A
01:06:46 LOT FROM FOLKS ABOUT THIS BUT PEOPLE SEEM TO HAVE FORGOTTEN
01:06:50 THAT WE HAD THIS CONVERSATION AGAIN WHEN WE WERE HAVING THE
01:06:54 DISCUSSIONS AROUND THE FAMILY ZONING PLAN PRETTY EXTENSIVELY
01:07:01 AND THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EXCLUSION OF THE PRIORITY
01:07:02 EQUITY GEOGRAPHIES AND HOW WE WERE THINKING ABOUT DENSITY
01:07:09 AND WHERE TO ADD DENSITY AND WE TALKED EXTENSIVE LEE ABOUT SB
01:07:14 79 THE MAP OF THE PARCELS THAT SB 79 APPLIED TO I MADE MR. SO
01:07:22 IT'S KEY TO SUBMIT THAT DURING THE FAMILY ZONING PLAN
01:07:23 DISCUSSIONS MUCH TO HIS CHAGRIN BECAUSE I WAS YOU KNOW PUSHING
01:07:27 HIM TO DO IT BEFORE BUT WE HAD IT IN IT DEFINITELY WEIGHED OUR
01:07:33 DISCUSSIONS AROUND THE FAMILY ZONING PLAN.
01:07:36 >> SO I JUST WANT TO REMIND US ALL THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'VE ALL
01:07:38 BEEN HERE BEFORE BUT MY QUESTION SPECIFICALLY TO YOU
01:07:41 WAS ABOUT SECURE. SO RIGHT NOW SECURE DOESN'T
01:07:47 APPLY TO THAT CURRENT IMPLEMENT INTERPRETATION OF THE REZONING
01:07:53 THAT WE THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TODAY.
01:07:56 >> BUT IF WE WERE GOING TO DO SOMETHING ELSE, IF WE WERE
01:08:00 GOING TO CHANGE THIS WOULD WOULD HAVE TO DO SECURE JOSHUA
01:08:04 CITY WITH PLANNING STAFF. SHORT ANSWER IS NO.
01:08:10 SB 79 ITSELF PROVIDES A SECURE EXEMPTION FOR ANY LOCAL
01:08:15 ORDINANCE THAT CHANGES ZONING WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF WHAT SB 79
01:08:21 PROVIDES FOR. SO ANY OF THE HEIGHTS DENSITIES
01:08:22 OR LAND USE PROVISIONS IN SB 79 A LOCAL ORDINANCE WOULD NOT BE
01:08:26 SUBJECT TO SECURE IF IT WAS DOING THOSE THINGS.
01:08:29 SO WHETHER WE'RE DOING IT NOW OR IN THE FUTURE TO CHANGE ANY
01:08:33 OF THIS OR ANY OTHER ZONING IN SB 79 AREAS YEAH, ANYTHING
01:08:37 WITHIN THE PRESCRIPTIONS OF THE HEIGHTS AND DENSITIES AND LAND
01:08:41 USE PROVISIONS OF SB 17 WOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO SEQUEL.
01:08:45 >> OKAY. I HAVE ANOTHER TECHNICAL
01:08:48 QUESTION THAT PERHAPS ONLY YOU CAN ANSWER AND THAT IS I
01:08:51 NOTICED YOU KNOW CONCENTRATION OF PARCELS ALONG GUERRERO
01:08:56 AVENUE AND DISTRICT EIGHT AND I KNOW THAT MY COLLEAGUE I DON'T
01:08:59 WANT TO PUT WORDS IN HIS MOUTH BECAUSE HE'S NOT HERE OBVIOUSLY
01:09:02 BUT HE'S GONE TO GREAT LENGTH AND WE'VE HAD LOTS OF
01:09:04 DISCUSSIONS ABOUT HIM AND HE'S PUT FORWARD LOTS OF LEGISLATION
01:09:09 AGAINST WHAT HE PERCEIVED AS YOU KNOW, THIS TREND TOWARDS
01:09:13 MCMANSIONS, YOU KNOW AND HIS DISTRICT NOT NECESSARILY ALL
01:09:18 GUERRERO A LITTLE BIT FARTHER UP THE HILL BUT HE'S DONE A LOT
01:09:21 OF WORK ON SPECIAL USE DISTRICTS THAT JUST PREVENT
01:09:25 PEOPLE FROM GOING HIGHER AND TAKING UP MORE BULK WITHOUT
01:09:29 ADDING UNITS. CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT THE HEIGHT
01:09:30 WOULD BE ALONG GUERRERO AVENUE IF IF WE DIDN'T DO THIS IF WE
01:09:37 DIDN'T PASS THIS ORDINANCE RIGHT.
01:09:41 >> LET'S PUT BACK TO THE MAP. I NEED TO GET MY GLASSES OUT.
01:09:51 >> IT'S THE FIRST TIME I'VE WRITTEN THIS IN PUBLIC SO AS I
01:10:02 SEE IT IT APPEARS WELL IT VARIES BUT GENERALLY SPEAKING
01:10:07 IT WOULD PROBABLY BE 65FT. >> YEAH.
01:10:09 OKAY. YEAH.
01:10:09 AND I SHOULD JUST NOTE THAT THE AS SARA MENTIONED ALL OF THE
01:10:13 ZONING PRESCRIPTIONS, WHETHER IT BE THE YOU KNOW, LARGE HOME
01:10:17 LIMITS AND ALL THOSE THINGS CONTINUE TO APPLY.
01:10:20 >> YEAH. BUT I DON'T THINK THERE'S A
01:10:24 LARGE HOME. >> NO SB 79 ITSELF DOES NOT
01:10:25 HAVE ANY SUCH LIMITATION. >> OKAY.
01:10:28 THANK YOU SO MUCH. SUPERVISOR MAHMOOD I THANK YOU
01:10:32 ALL FOR THE PRESENTATION AND I HAVE A SERIES OF QUESTIONS
01:10:36 ABOUT THE CONTEXT OF THE INTENTION OF SB 79 AND HOW THIS
01:10:41 RELATES TO THIS ORDINANCE THAT WE'RE PASSING TO I GET SOME
01:10:44 EXEMPTIONS. I MEAN JUST TO CLARIFY AGAIN,
01:10:48 IF WE THIS ORDINANCE IS NOT REQUIRED CORRECT?
01:10:54 >> NO CITIES DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO PASS AN ORDINANCE IF
01:10:58 THEY DON'T SO CHOOSE. >> UNDERSTOOD.
01:11:01 AND I KNOW CHAIR MELGAR MENTIONED ABOUT HOW SOME OF THE
01:11:05 INTENTION I THINK OF THIS ORDINANCE WAS KIND OF EXEMPTING
01:11:08 SOME PRIORITY EQUITY GEOGRAPHIES THAT WE TALKED
01:11:10 ABOUT DURING THE FAMILY ZONING PLAN IS I THINK WHAT WE JUST
01:11:13 HEARD. BUT IT LOOKS LIKE THIS
01:11:14 EXEMPTION WOULD HAVE LOWER HEIGHTS PRETTY MUCH ALL ACROSS
01:11:18 THE CITY THAN WHAT SB 79 AUTHORIZES USES AND SHOULD GO
01:11:25 INTO EFFECT. SO WHY ARE WE TRYING TO DO THAT
01:11:29 ALL ACROSS THE CITY? >> HEIGHTS WOULD NOT ARE NOT
01:11:32 WOULD NOT BE LOWER ACROSS THE CITY AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE MAP
01:11:36 THERE'S DIFFERENT SHADING. OUR ZONING IS HIGHER IN MANY
01:11:40 AREAS AND SB 79 IS HIGHER IN MANY AREAS.
01:11:43 AGAIN THAT IS JUST HEIGHT THAT IS NOT NECESSARILY DENSITY OR
01:11:47 HOUSING CAPACITY AS TO HEIGHT. SO BASICALLY SAYING THAT YOU
01:11:50 KNOW THE YELLOW BUT 25 YELLOW IS IS YEAH ONE FOOT TO TWO YOU
01:11:55 KNOW BASICALLY 1 TO 2 STORIES GENERALLY.
01:11:56 SO WHY WHY DO THAT? >> THE CITY HAS SPENT A LONG
01:12:03 TIME WHETHER IS THE FAMILY ZONING PLAN OR OTHER PLANS THAT
01:12:06 PRECEDED IT DELIBERATING ON WHAT THE CITY SUPERVISORS FELT
01:12:10 WERE THE APPROPRIATE HEIGHTS AND DENSITIES IN THESE AREAS
01:12:15 AND A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE AND PUBLIC TIME HAS BEEN SPENT
01:12:18 OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF DECADES SORTING THIS ALL OUT.
01:12:25 >> AND CERTAINLY THE MAYOR'S OFFICE AND PUTTING FORWARD THIS
01:12:28 ORDINANCE AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEEL THAT, YOU KNOW,
01:12:30 HONORING THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE BY THE THE HARD WORK BY
01:12:36 THE LEGISLATURE AND THE PUBLIC TO CRAFT THE ZONING ACROSS THE
01:12:40 CITY THAT MORE THAN MEETS THE OBLIGATIONS OF SB 79 AS YOU
01:12:44 HEARD BY SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITS THAT WE ARE TO
01:12:47 LET OUR EXISTING ZONING CONTINUE TO BE THE LAW OF THE
01:12:52 LAND AND IF THE BOARD SO CHOOSES TO CHANGE IT, THE BOARD
01:12:55 CAN CAN CHANGE OUR ZONING AND MOVING FORWARD.
01:12:56 >> WE'RE CURRENTLY UNDER LITIGATION FOR MULTIPLE
01:12:59 LAWSUITS SAYING WE DON'T DO ENOUGH TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
01:13:03 OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THIS WOULD
01:13:07 PUT US BASICALLY AT THE MINIMUM ALLOWED BY STATE LAW.
01:13:11 >> SO WHY SHOULDN'T WE BE GOING A LITTLE BIT ABOVE NO, THIS IS
01:13:15 NOT THE MINIMUM AS WE STATED OUR LOCAL ZONING EXCEEDS SB 79
01:13:18 REQUIREMENTS BY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNITS.
01:13:22 OKAY. TALKING ABOUT THE WHY ARE WE
01:13:26 PRECLUDING HOUSING FROM BEING BUILT IN THE INDUSTRIAL
01:13:27 DEVELOPMENT HUBS IT SOUNDS LIKE THAT'S THE EXEMPTION THAT THE
01:13:30 STATE PROVIDES CORRECT? THAT IS ONE OF THE EXEMPTIONS
01:13:34 IS IT'S NOTED I THINK SOME OF THE COMMUNITY ADVOCATES HAD
01:13:38 NOTED TO US THAT IN THE WESTERN ZONE AND WESTERN SUMMER
01:13:41 INDUSTRIAL HUB THE MIXED OFFICE USE ZONE ACTUALLY ALLOWS FOR
01:13:49 ADA USE PURSUANT TO THE CITY'S LOCAL ADU ORDINANCE AND THE
01:13:52 SERVICE ARTS AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ALSO ALLOWS
01:13:55 ANY USE UNDER THE LOCAL ORDINANCE PLUS 100% AFFORDABLE
01:13:59 HOUSING PROJECTS. SO THAT SEEMS TO MAYBE BUT
01:14:03 THOSE ALSO ARE WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT HUB
01:14:07 REGIONS AS WELL AS THE CITY SOUGHT THE OPINION OF EACH CITY
01:14:10 AS TO WHETHER THESE PARCELS IN THESE DISTRICTS ARE ELIGIBLE
01:14:12 FOR WITHDRAWAL OR NOT ITS USE OR NOT PRINCIPALLY PERMITTED
01:14:14 WHERE HOUSING IS NOT PRINCIPALLY PERMITTED TO USE
01:14:18 ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO THE EXTENT THAT THERE IS EXISTING HOUSING
01:14:21 ON THOSE PARCELS. SO YOU COULD NOT BUILD AN 80
01:14:23 YOU ON A PROPERTY IN THOSE DISTRICTS THAT DIDN'T ALREADY
01:14:26 HAVE HOUSING ON IT EVEN THOSE ZONED TO ALLOW FOR IT.
01:14:30 >> YES YOU CAN'T HAVE AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT IF YOU
01:14:31 DON'T HAVE A PRIMARY DWELLING UNIT.
01:14:34 THERE'S ALSO AN ALLOWANCE FOR PLUS 100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING
01:14:37 PROJECTS IN THE SALLIE DISTRICT .
01:14:40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS NOT PRINCIPALLY PERMITTED.
01:14:41 NONE OF THESE DISTRICTS PRINCIPALLY PERMIT HOUSING OF
01:14:44 ANY KIND WHICH IS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BILL.
01:14:48 IT IS TRUE THAT 100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS CAN BE DISCRETIONARY
01:14:51 CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED IN THE SALLY BUT WE BELIEVE AND OUR
01:14:59 CLOSE READING OF THE LAW IS THAT THE LAW IS TALKING ABOUT
01:15:02 PRINCIPALLY PERMITTED USES OKAY THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFUSING
01:15:06 REFERENCES IN THE IN THE IN THE LAW THAT YOU HAVE TO DIG DOWN
01:15:08 AND WE BELIEVE IT IS TALKING ABOUT PRINCIPLE PERMITTED USES
01:15:12 UNDERSTOOD. I THINK I'LL JUST RAISE AGAIN
01:15:15 IN THE CLOSING COMPONENTS I KNOW YOU'RE SAYING THAT THIS IS
01:15:17 OVER A HUNDRED THOUSAND BEYOND CAPACITY AND I THINK THERE'S
01:15:19 STILL CONCERNS THE FAMILY ZONING PLAN MAY NOT MEET THE
01:15:23 NECESSARY COMPONENTS OF OUR HOUSING ELEMENT.
01:15:26 AND SO I THINK THIS THERE'S A POTENTIAL I THINK I'VE HEARD
01:15:29 FROM ACTIVISTS THAT WE MAY NEED TO CONSIDER TO RE REVIEW
01:15:33 WHETHER THESE LIMITS ARE GOING TO BE HOLDING US BACK FROM
01:15:38 BEING FLEXIBLE AND MEETING OUR GOALS.
01:15:39 AND SO MY HOPE WOULD BE THAT WE CAN AT LEAST DUPLICATE THE FILE
01:15:42 TO ENSURE WE CAN CONTINUE TO HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS
01:15:45 AND IRON OUT SOME OF WHAT THOSE DISCREPANCIES MIGHT BE.
01:15:49 WE WOULD AGREE WITH THAT. THERE'S NOTHING PREVENTING THE
01:15:50 BOARD FROM TAKING UP OTHER ZONING CHANGES IN THE FUTURE.
01:15:54 THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
01:15:57 YES WE CAN ALWAYS DO BETTER. I'LL JUST POINT OUT THAT WE'RE
01:16:01 BEING SUED BY BOTH SIDES. >> SUPERVISOR CHEN THANK YOU
01:16:05 CHAIR MALCOLM JUST WANT TO SHARE WHEN SB 79 WAS INTRODUCED
01:16:10 IT THIS BOARD ENGAGED IT IN A SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT
01:16:13 THE IMPACT OF THE LEGISLATION AND THE NEED TO ADOPT
01:16:16 SAFEGUARDS. >> I BELIEVE ALL OF US ON THE
01:16:21 BOY WANT TO SUPPORT THAT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DONE THE
01:16:24 RIGHT WAY. I BELIEVE THEN AND I CONTINUE
01:16:27 TO BELIEVE THAT THE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT CAN BE
01:16:32 BENEFICIAL. IT REDUCES COMMUTES LOWER
01:16:35 CARBON EMISSIONS AND IT REDUCES RELIANCE ON CARS.
01:16:39 I ALSO BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD BE INCENTIVIZING DEVELOPMENT
01:16:42 IN AREAS THAT CAN ABSORB IT WITHOUT CAUSING HARM.
01:16:44 SUCH AS AREA WHAT ROLE DOES EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURES
01:16:50 AND LESS DISPLACEMENT RISK FOR NEIGHBORHOODS FACING
01:16:54 DISPLACEMENT WE MUST PRIORITIZE ENTITIES PLACEMENT STRATEGIES,
01:16:58 ROBUST TENANT PROTECTIONS PROTECTION FOR OUR STOCK OF
01:17:02 RENT CONTROLLED HOUSING AND SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT
01:17:05 IN TRULY AFFORDABLE HOUSING. I RECOGNIZE THAT CRAFTING THIS
01:17:10 LEGISLATION HAS BEEN A COMPLEX TEXT AND I APPRECIATE THE WORK
01:17:14 OF THE DEPARTMENT. THANK YOU.
01:17:17 IN CRAFTING THIS ORDINANCE THE DEPARTMENT HAS UTILIZED IT ALL
01:17:21 THE LAWFUL PROVISIONS AVAILABLE IN SB 79 TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL
01:17:24 INCLUDING THE PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EXCLUSIONS
01:17:28 AND EXEMPTION THAT AT LEAST UNTIL 2032 AND I WILL BE VOTING
01:17:35 IN SUPPORT OF THIS LEGISLATION TODAY.
01:17:36 THANK YOU FOR THE ONE. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
01:17:40 WITH THAT LET'S GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM PLEASE MR.
01:17:45 CLERK. >> THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.
01:17:48 LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION WILL NOW TAKE PUBLIC COMMENT
01:17:49 RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE TRANSIT ORIENTED
01:17:52 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. IF YOU HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR
01:17:53 THIS ITEM PLEASE LINE UP TO SPEAK ALONG THAT WESTERN WALL
01:17:57 AND COME FORWARD TO THE LECTERN .
01:18:00 >> YOU'RE THE FIRST SPEAKER. GOOD AFTERNOON SUPERVISORS ZACH
01:18:01 WISE AND BERGER WITH YOUNG COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS I AM
01:18:04 SPEAKING IN SUPPORT OF THE SB 79 IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE
01:18:08 BEFORE YOU TODAY WHEN SB 79 WAS INTRODUCED IN THE STATE
01:18:11 LEGISLATURE WE OPPOSED THE BILL DUE TO ITS CONCENTRATED IMPACTS
01:18:14 IN LOW INCOME COMMUNITIES OF COLOR DISPROPORTION REALLY
01:18:18 AFFECTING RESIDENTS WHO RELY ON PUBLIC TRANSIT AND ARE ALREADY
01:18:19 VULNERABLE TO DISPLACEMENT AS SAN FRANCISCO'S HOUSING ELEMENT
01:18:24 DOCUMENTS BETWEEN 2005 AND 2020, APPROXIMATELY 85% OF
01:18:28 NEW HOUSING PRODUCTION OCCURRED IN JUST A HANDFUL OF LOW INCOME
01:18:30 NEIGHBORHOODS ON THE CITY'S EAST SIDE AND WITHOUT
01:18:32 INTERVENTION SB 79 WILL CONTINUE AND ACCELERATE THIS
01:18:35 PATTERN. THAT OUTCOME WOULD DIRECTLY
01:18:36 CONTRADICT OUR HOUSING ELEMENTS CORE FHA OBLIGATION TO ENSURE
01:18:40 AN EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF GROWTH ACROSS ALL
01:18:44 NEIGHBORHOODS. HOWEVER THE LEGISLATION BEFORE
01:18:45 YOU TODAY IS IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE AND THAT DISTINCTION
01:18:48 IS CRITICAL. >> IF WE DON'T PASS THIS
01:18:51 LEGISLATION, SB 79 WILL OVERRIDE LOCAL ZONING ACROSS
01:18:53 MUCH OF THE CITY. THIS ORDINANCE ALLOWS SAN
01:18:54 FRANCISCO TO TAKE BACK SOME CONTROL BY APPLYING CLEAR
01:18:58 GUARDRAILS THAT LIMIT THE LIMIT THE CONTINUATION OF PAST
01:18:59 INEQUITIES IN PARTICULAR THE ORDINANCES EXEMPTIONS FOR PDR
01:19:03 ZONES ARE ESSENTIAL. THESE AREAS PROVIDE CRITICAL
01:19:06 BLUE COLLAR JOB OPPORTUNITIES FOR WORKING CLASS COMMUNITIES,
01:19:09 IMMIGRANTS AND COMMUNITIES OF COLOR IN OUR SPACES THE CITY
01:19:11 HAS BEEN STEADILY LOSING FOR DECADES.
01:19:13 EARLIER VERSIONS OF SB 79 WOULD HAVE ALLOWED THESE INDUSTRIAL
01:19:15 EMPLOYMENT HUBS TO BE CONVERTED TO HOUSING AS THE LEGISLATION
01:19:18 MOVED THROUGH THE STATE LEGISLATURE, WE ENGAGED WITH
01:19:21 THE BILL'S SPONSOR AND SECURED AMENDMENTS ALLOWING CITIES TO
01:19:22 EXEMPT THESE JOB CENTERS. STRONG LOCAL PROTECTIONS FOR
01:19:25 PDR REMAIN ESSENTIAL TO MAINTAINING ECONOMIC DIVERSITY
01:19:29 AND PREVENTING DISPLACEMENT OF WORKING CLASS JOBS WITHOUT THIS
01:19:32 IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE S.F. WOULD BE EXPOSED TO THE FULL
01:19:33 FORCE OF SB 79 INCLUDING INCREASED PRESSURE TO CONVERT
01:19:36 REMAINING PDR SPACE TO HOUSING AND FURTHER CONCENTRATION OF
01:19:40 MARKET RATE DEVELOPMENT IN VULNERABLE COMMUNITIES AT A
01:19:44 TIME WHEN THE CITY IS ALREADY GRAPPLING WITH THE LONG TERM
01:19:46 LOSS OF INDUSTRIAL LAND AND MIDDLE INCOME JOB PATHWAYS,
01:19:49 IT IS CRITICAL THAT WE PRESERVE WHAT WE HAVE.
01:19:52 FOR THESE REASONS WE URGE YOUR SUPPORT TODAY.
01:19:53 THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
01:19:56 NEXT SPEAKER PLEASE. >> GOOD AFTERNOON SUPERVISORS.
01:20:00 MY NAME IS SHAWN OAKLAND. I'M ON THE BOARD OF SOMA WEST A
01:20:04 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND OUR ASSOCIATION REPRESENTS
01:20:07 THE NEIGHBORHOOD RUNNING FROM FIFTH STREET ALL THE WAY TO
01:20:10 NESS MARKET TO TOWNSEND. YET WE RECEIVED ZERO OF THE
01:20:14 COMMUNITY OUTREACH THAT WAS DESCRIBED HERE TODAY.
01:20:17 WE STRONGLY URGE YOU TO REJECT THE PROPOSED SB 79 ALTERNATIVE
01:20:21 PLAN UNLESS SECTION THREE IS COMPLETELY REMOVED SECTION
01:20:26 THREE PERMANENTLY EXEMPTS TRANSIT RICH CORRIDORS IN OUR
01:20:27 NEIGHBORHOOD FROM US BE 79 MAKING MIXED INCOME HOUSING
01:20:30 EFFECTIVELY ILLEGAL AND WE STAND WITH YIMBY ASSAF AND GROW
01:20:35 S.F. THAT HAVE BOTH TAKEN THE SAME POSITION FOR SOME OF US
01:20:38 THIS LEGISLATION IS A TOOL FOR ECONOMIC SUPPRESSION.
01:20:42 >> WE NEED MORE RESIDENTS TO CREATE STREET SAFETY, SUPPORT
01:20:46 LOCAL RETAIL AND PREVENT THE CONDITIONS THAT LEAD TO OPEN
01:20:47 DRUG USE AND ENCAMPMENTS AS HIGHLIGHTED IN RECENT S.F.
01:20:50 CHRONICLE COVERAGE. THEY CALLED THIS PROVISION THE
01:20:54 PRESERVATION OF BLIGHT. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS ACTIVELY
01:20:58 ASKING FOR MORE MARKET RATE HOUSING INSTEAD THE CITY'S
01:21:02 METHODOLOGY BLOCKS MIXED INCOME HOUSING BY CLAIMING A SITE AS
01:21:06 AN INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT HUB BY THE WAY, MANY OF THOSE PARCELS
01:21:10 ARE VACANT AND BOARDED UP WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY ALLOWING
01:21:13 SHELTERS AND 100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON THAT EXACT SAME
01:21:17 PARCEL. THIS THOSE THIS ZONING DOES NOT
01:21:18 PRESERVE A THRIVING INDUSTRIAL BASE.
01:21:21 IT PRESERVES BLIGHT FROM THE 1990S BECAUSE OF THESE ONGOING
01:21:26 EXCLUSIONARY PRACTICES WE CURRENTLY HAVE AN ACT OF FAIR
01:21:30 HOUSING COMPLAINT PENDING WITH CD.
01:21:32 FURTHERMORE, I WOULD JUST POINT OUT THAT DESIGNATING W AND M.O.
01:21:36 WESTERN SOMA MIXED USE OFFICE PARCELS AS PERMANENTLY EXEMPT
01:21:44 BECAUSE THEY ARE INDUSTRIAL I THINK IS SILLY BECAUSE OF THE
01:21:48 NAME ITSELF CLEAR CLASSIFYING THOSE IS ALSO REGULATORY BAD
01:21:52 BAD FAITH WE NEED MIXED INCOME HOUSING NEAR CIVIC CENTER
01:21:57 STATION WE ASK YOU TO REMOVE SECTION THREE AND WORK WITH
01:22:01 SUPERVISOR DORSEY TO IMPLEMENT SB 79 EARLY IN SOMA OUR TAX
01:22:03 RECEIPT DATA JUST SHOWED -50% FOR SOMA AND PLUS 25% TAXES,
01:22:09 TAX REVENUES AND MISSION BAY. >> WE ARE STRUGGLING TO GROW
01:22:14 AND WE NEED HOUSING TO DO THAT. THANK YOU.
01:22:18 >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. DO YOU HAVE ANYONE ELSE HAS
01:22:19 PUBLIC COMMENT FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE AND I'M SURE OKAY
01:22:24 LOOKS LIKE PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOW CLOSED SO COLLEAGUES AT
01:22:27 THANK YOU FOR ENGAGING IN THIS CONVERSATION.
01:22:31 THANK YOU FOR PLANNING STAFF AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY
01:22:35 WHO WEIGHED IN. I THINK THAT SOME OF THE
01:22:39 FEEDBACK THAT WE HEARD TODAY AND CERTAINLY I HAVE GOTTEN IS
01:22:46 MORE ABOUT OUR EXISTING ZONING THAN ABOUT HOW SB 79 WILL
01:22:50 AFFECT US AND I THINK THAT IS SOMETHING AS MR. SAWICKI YOU
01:22:57 KNOW COMMENTED IF FOLKS IN THE COMMUNITY IF YOU KNOW RATHER
01:23:02 THAN A SAN FRANCISCO WORKING WITH THIS BODY WANT TO CHANGE
01:23:08 SALLY OR YOU KNOW THE PDR DESIGNATION OR ANY OF THE
01:23:13 UNDERLYING ZONING, I THINK WE CAN TACKLE THAT BUT I THINK
01:23:16 THAT THAT'S NOT EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE DOING TODAY.
01:23:20 SO WITH THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE FIRST A MOTION THAT WE
01:23:27 MAKE THE AMENDMENT TO FIX THE CLERICAL ERROR IN THE ORDINANCE
01:23:32 AND LONG TITLE REPLACING WMU AG TO WMU OH OH AND TO MAKE THE
01:23:40 ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS TO THE PARCEL TABLES IN THE AMENDMENTS
01:23:44 PRESENTED BY STAFF. SO LET'S LET'S DO THAT FIRST
01:23:48 MR. CLERK LET'S CALL THE ROLL IN THAT ON THE MOTION OFFERED
01:23:51 BY THE CHAIR TO MAKE AN AMENDMENT TO CORRECT THE
01:23:55 CLERICAL ERROR AND ALSO TO MAKE THE CHANGE REGARDING THE PARCEL
01:23:59 TABLE. VICE CHAIR CHEN CHEN I REMEMBER
01:24:02 MAHMOOD MAHMOOD I CHAIR MELGAR I MELGAR I AND I'M SURE THERE
01:24:06 ARE THREE EYES ON THAT MOTION TO AMEND.
01:24:09 >> OKAY THANK YOU. AND SO I AM YOU KNOW COGNIZANT
01:24:13 A SUPERVISOR MAHMUD EXPRESSED A YOU KNOW DESIRE TO TO KEEP
01:24:17 WORKING ON THIS AND CERTAINLY WHEN WE PASSED THE FAMILY
01:24:25 ZONING PLAN WE WERE IN CONSTANT COMMUNICATION WITH THE SAFARI
01:24:29 CITY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE STAYED IN COMPLIANCE AND THAT
01:24:33 THINGS WERE BEING DONE IN A WAY THAT WOULD PRESERVE OUR
01:24:36 COLLECTIVE GOALS. SO WITH THAT IN MIND I WOULD
01:24:39 LIKE TO DUPLICATE THE FILE AS WAS REQUESTED AND MAKE A MOTION
01:24:47 TO MAKE AN ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT TO THE DUPLICATED FILE WHICH
01:24:53 WILL INCLUDE IN THE FINDINGS A REFERENCE TO THE STATE HCV
01:25:01 CONTINUE WORKING CONSULTING WITH THEM.
01:25:05 LET'S CALL THE ROLL ON THAT AMENDMENT A MOTION OFFERED BY
01:25:09 THE CHAIR THAT A DUPLICATE OF THE FILE MADE INCORPORATING THE
01:25:13 PREVIOUS AMENDMENTS BE THEN AMENDED TO INCORPORATE THE
01:25:16 CHANGE ABOUT THE CD FOR THE REVIEW.
01:25:20 VICE CHAIR CHEN ON THAT MOTION I MEMBER MOHAMMED MAHMUD I
01:25:24 CHAIR MELGAR I MELGAR I MADAM CHAIR THERE ARE THREE EYES ON
01:25:28 THAT MOTION TO AMEND THE DUPLICATED FILE.
01:25:30 >> OKAY SO NOW I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CONTINUE
01:25:34 THAT DUPLICATED FILE AS AMENDED AS AMENDED TO THE CALL OF THE
01:25:39 CHAIR ON THE MOTION OFFERED BY THE CHAIR THAT THE DUPLICATED
01:25:43 FILE BE CONTINUED AS AMENDED TO THE CALL THE CHAIR VICE CHAIR
01:25:47 CHIN CHIN I MEMBER MAHMOOD MAHMOOD I CHAIR MELGAR I MELGAR
01:25:51 I MADAM CHAIR THERE ARE THREE EYES ON THAT MOTION TO CONTINUE
01:25:55 TO THE CALL THE CHAIR AS AMENDED.
01:25:56 >> OKAY THANK YOU. >> NOW THE LAST MOTION WOULD BE
01:25:59 TO CONTINUE THE ORIGINAL FILE AS AMENDED TO THE NEXT MEETING
01:26:05 ON MONDAY APRIL 20TH 2026 ON THE MOTION OFFERED BY THE CHAIR
01:26:12 THAT THE ORIGINAL FILE BE CONTINUED AS AMENDED TO APRIL
01:26:17 20TH, 2026. VICE CHAIR CHEN CHEN I MEMBER
01:26:21 MARCHMAN MAHMUD I CHAIR MELGAR I MELGAR I MET HIM TWO THERE
01:26:24 ARE THREE EYES ON THAT MOTION TO CONTINUE THE ORIGINAL FILE
01:26:28 AS AMENDED TO APRIL 20TH 2026. >> OKAY GREAT MR. CLERK DO WE
01:26:36 HAVE ANY OTHER BUSINESS ON OUR AGENDA?
01:26:37 NO FURTHER BUSINESS. >> WE ARE ADJOURNED.
01:26:40 THANK YOU