of people experiencing homelessness who prefer such a residential option; require that City funding
for new Site-Based PSH for people experiencing homelessness be used for Drug-Free PSH except
where operation of the housing as Drug-Free PSH would conflict with standards imposed by law or by
a condition of other funding, where the funding is for new construction, or the Board of Supervisors
has waived the funding requirement based on specific findings; require the Department of
Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”) to survey residents of Site-Based PSH to assess
their interest in living in either Drug-Tolerant PSH or Drug-Free PSH and report on the survey findings
and HSH’s strategies to meet PSH residents’ demands; and require HSH to adopt rules and
regulations establishing standards and protocols for evictions from City-funded Drug-Free Housing.
File No. 251003. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (13)
From Breathe California, regarding a proposed Ordinance amending the Health, Planning, Police, and
Business and Tax Regulations Codes to establish a new permit type for cannabis cafés to be
administered by the Office of Cannabis that will authorize the permittee to sell cannabis and cannabis
products only for consumption on the premises of the café; exempt cannabis cafés from the
prohibition on smoking in business establishments; eliminate the prohibition on establishments with a
cannabis consumption permit requiring employees to enter a designated smoking room as a condition
of employment; exempt cannabis cafés in certain circumstances from the 600-foot buffer rule that
applies to cannabis retail establishments; restrict eligibility for cannabis café permits for one year to
businesses that currently hold a cannabis storefront retailer permit or that have the same owners as
such a business; require Equity Applicants that apply for a cannabis café permit to pay the $2,000
application fee, any permit amendment processing costs, and the $3,000 license fee for the first year
of operation, associated with the cannabis café permit; affirming the Planning Department’s
determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the
General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public
necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302. File No. 260281.
Copy: Each Supervisor. (14)
From members of the public, regarding a Resolution authorizing the Sheriff’s Office to contract with
the San Francisco Pretrial Diversion Project (SF Pretrial) for Pretrial Services for a three year period
from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2029, for a contract total not to exceed amount of $22,532,145,
with two one-year options to extend. File No. 260442, Resolution no. 334-26. 5 Letters. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (15)
From members of the public and various organizations, regarding a proposed Ordinance amending
the Planning Code to: 1) reduce Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program requirements for projects of
25 units or more; 2) delete Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program requirements for projects under
25 units; 3) allow all projects to dedicate land to the City as an alternative to payment of the
Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program fee; 4) adopt a process for projects to request a modification
to conditions of approval related to Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program requirements; 5) delete
certain Article 4 affordable housing and development impact fees; and 6) adopt conforming
amendments to various sections of the Planning Code; amending the Building Code to reduce
Planning Code Article 4 development impact fees and allow deferral of payment of such fees; and
amending the Administrative Code to adopt conforming amendments to the requirements of the
Citywide Affordable Housing Fund; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the
California Environmental Quality Act; making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings
under Planning Code, Section 302; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the
eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. File No. 260538. 18 Letters. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (16)
From members of the public, regarding a Hearing of the Board of Supervisors sitting as a Committee
of the Whole on June 16, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., to consider the Department of Public Health's budget
reducing medical and health care services provided by the City and County of San Francisco for
Fiscal Years (FYs) 2026-2027 and 2027-2028, pursuant to California Health and Safety Code, Section
1442.5(a) (The Beilenson Act). File No. 260565. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (17)
From members of the public, regarding banning retail animal sales. 2 Letters Copy: Each Supervisor.
(18)
From members of the public, regarding safety bollards on Portola Drive. 2 Letters. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (19)
From Alex Ames, regarding the San Francisco Budget. File Nos. 260616, 260596, and 260597. Copy:
Each Supervisor. (20)
